Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br /> 8. SAN-REBA WOODS - PRELIMINARY PLAN <br /> Rick Prince, attorney for San-Reba Woods, indicated that the <br /> problems as identified in a letter from Mike Brough have been worked out. <br /> Greg Szymik presented for consideration of approval the Prelimi- <br /> nary Plan for San-Reba Woods. The property fronts on Craig Road in Eno <br /> Township and is split by the Orange-Durham County line. Thirty-five lots <br /> are proposed out of 50 acres. The property is zoned A-R and designated <br /> Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. Durham County has given <br /> approval of the lots located in that County. The Planning Board <br /> recommended approval with five (5) conditions. <br /> Rick Prince, in response to a request from Mike Brough, requested <br /> that a sixth condition be added as a requirement for approval. Mike <br /> Brough's office indicated agreement with this condition. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by <br /> Commissioner Carey to approve the Preliminary Plan with the following six <br /> conditions: <br /> (1) Submittal and approval by the County Attorney of a <br /> maintenance agreement for the recreation site and <br /> facilities. <br /> (2) Lots 3, 22, 34 and 35 must be combined with another lot or <br /> be labeled as being of restricted development potential as <br /> required by Section III-E-5-e of the Subdivision <br /> Regulations. <br /> (3) Roads must be named. <br /> (4) The phasing line between phases II & III must be moved to <br /> include the pedestrian easement in phase II. <br /> (5) Provision of a landscape plan demonstrating compliance with <br /> Section IV-B-8, including location of existing trees, land <br /> use buffers, and areas to be planted. <br /> (6) Upon final approval of phase 1 that the road that runs <br /> through phase 2 and phase 3 also be approved. At the time <br /> of recording of the final plat of phase 1, then that phase 1 <br /> plat should include dedication not only of the phase 1 <br /> streets but also dedication of phase 2 and phase 3 streets. <br /> This is based on the further condition that it not be <br /> necessary to build the phase 2 or phase 3 road or to post a <br /> bond to guarantee the building of that road until the plat <br /> that places a record of lots in phase 2 and phase 3 are <br /> actually recorded. The posting of the bond for phases 2 and <br /> 3 will be waived until the final plat is recorded. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 9. POLICY - APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO SECTION IV-B- 8 OF <br /> SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS <br /> Greg Szymik presented for consideration of approval a policy for <br /> applying landscape requirements to subdivision applications that were in <br /> process when the new standards went into effect. On March 24, the Board <br /> of County Commissioners approved amendments to Section IV-B-8, Landscaping <br /> and Buffer Requirements, of the Subdivision Regulations. Enforcement of <br /> Section IV-B-8-c-1 was suspended by a moratorium passed by the <br /> Commissioners on December 1, 1986. This moratorium was no longer valid <br /> when the amendments were adopted. The Planning Board recommended approval <br /> of the following policy and the Manager concurs with this recommendation: <br /> (1) In the case of major subdivision, preliminary plan approval <br /> was obtained between December 1, 1986 and March 24, 1987. <br /> (2) In the case of minor subdivision, sketch plan approval was <br /> obtained between December 1, 1986 and March 24, 1987. <br /> The County Attorney recommended that the Ordinance amendments be <br />