Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-04-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 05-04-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:16:18 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 11:32:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U6 8 <br /> transition area boundary line. Everything within it, as was pointed <br /> out by Alderperson Wegner, would be subject to the Town of <br /> Carrboro' s jurisdiction if the County adopts their land development <br /> ordinances and zoning map. The rural buffer would be everything <br /> beyond that line and would encompass all the area that you see in a <br /> cream color as well as the interspersed green areas which are Duke <br /> Forest and the Resource Conservation District. <br /> In terms of Item 2. the zoning exchange, the larger map to my right <br /> shows the bulk of the joint planning area between Chapel Hill and <br /> Carrboro and Orange County. The grey areas that you see show the <br /> existing corporate limits as well as the existing extraterritorial <br /> areas. North of Carrboro the cross hatched areas that you see <br /> represent two possible alternatives for jurisdictional exchange <br /> which Alderperson Wegner has already discussed. The map to my far <br /> left shows the same areas on the Carrboro zoning map. These were <br /> prepared by the Town of Carrboro for discussion purposes only and <br /> they show the range of possibilities. <br /> The elongated orange colored area at the top and oriented in a <br /> northwest-southeast direction in a is the existing Univeristy Lake <br /> watershed of approximately 1800 acres under Carrboro's jurisdiction. <br /> The lighter area just north of Carrboro's jurisdiction represents <br /> one end of the continuum. That is based on an exchange using a <br /> density capacity of five units per acre. If that approach were <br /> used, 228 acres would be needed to accommodate the number of <br /> dwelling units that can be built in the Town of Carrboro's zoning <br /> jurisdiction under the present zoning ordinances in the University <br /> Lake watershed. If you go to the other extreme, that is an acre- <br /> for-acre swap. the light area to the northwest of Carrboro as well <br /> as the dark area together would encompass 1800 acres, and it would <br /> extend almost up to Eubanks Road. That would accommodate again on <br /> an acre-for-acre basis the same number of units permitted in <br /> University Lake watershed plus a great more if the transition area <br /> is extended. <br /> The Planning Department of Orange County staff takes no position on <br /> either proposal at this time. The matters are for discussion on <br /> behalf of the citizens. <br /> • • _ + ,' - • _ , . - • •1- , . ' , • • , explained <br /> the process of land use planning in Orange County, noting no <br /> decisions are to be made at the hearing. The only purpose of the <br /> hearing is to present information and to allow the citizens an <br /> opportunity to digest it and to express their thoughts. After the <br /> hearing, the matter is referred back to the Planning Board which <br /> also confers with the Township Advisory Council, in this case from <br /> Chapel Hill Township. The Planning Board will then make a decision <br /> or recommendation and present it to the Commissioners. <br /> Bteve Yuhasz, Orange County Planning Hoard member asked what the <br /> effective difference in the transition area between having extra <br /> territorial jurisdiction and just being a party to the Joint <br /> Planning Agreement would mean to Carrboro. <br /> Collins responded that Alderperson Wegner alluded to this issue in <br /> her presentation. One difference would be that Carrboro would have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.