Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-04-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 05-04-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:16:18 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 11:32:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> local intergovernmental working group instead of the Chair, on election, <br /> automatically becoming an ex officio member. <br /> Commissioner Carey stated the importance of the Chair serving as <br /> an ex officio member of any group involving the three governmental units <br /> stating that this is a responsibility that goes along with being Chair. <br /> It was decided that this recommendation would be reviewed at the <br /> first meeting in December. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit objected to the third recommendation stating <br /> no need for this because no one has expressed an interest in talking about <br /> extension of extra-territorial jurisdiction. <br /> Chair Marshall emphasized that the issue was raised when talking <br /> about the swap of extraterritorial jurisdiction and it became quite clear <br /> that there was one view of this intergovernmental cooperation and that it <br /> was a territorial issue. Disenfranchisment was brought forward several <br /> times at the public hearing. She feels it important that the citizens <br /> understand that the Board is against moving people that are not in the <br /> extra territorial jurisdiction into the extra-territorial jurisdiction and <br /> that joint planning is the solution. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Hartwell to instruct County members of the working intergovernmental group <br /> to not consider, as a part of their deliberations, disenfranchisement of <br /> county citizens through placing them in extra-territorial jurisdiction but <br /> will emphasize and encourage intergovernmental cooperation to achieve <br /> planning goals. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit suggested that a more formal mechanism be <br /> put in place to inform each other on the Board of the various happenings <br /> on the different groups that each represent and Commissioner Halkiotis <br /> suggested that this be reviewed after the budget process is finished. <br /> 2 . JOINT PLANNING AREA LAND USE PLAN <br /> (1) EXPANSION OF TRANSITION AREA <br /> 12) BOUNDARY DESIGNATION - TRANSITION AREA/RURAL BUFFER <br /> (3) ORANGE COUNTY-CARRBORO ZONING JURISDICTION BOUNDARY <br /> Planning Board Chair Barry Jacobs presented the Planning Board <br /> recommendation as stated below in the motion for approval. <br /> Judith Wegner, member of the Carrboro Board, stated that there is a <br /> consensus on the Carrboro Board that the swap idea should not be pursued. <br /> The Board agrees with the representation suggestion and she stated that <br /> the legislation submitted provides for that representation. If the <br /> Planning Board recommendation is adopted, the Carrboro Board will review <br /> and provide additional comments if necessary. She emphasized that <br /> continued dialogue is very important. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit referred to the two designations to be <br /> established for Duke Forest. He questioned the rationale for indicating <br /> that those properties abutting Duke Forest will be kept out of the <br /> transition area and placed as part of the Rural Buffer. As part of the <br /> Land Use Plan this property would have a buffer as it was developed. <br /> Collins indicated that the buffer would be a condition placed upon any <br /> of the land developed along the Duke Forest line. <br /> Don Epling, Associate University Counselor at Duke, stated that they <br /> are in the process of studying the purposes and goals for the use of Duke <br /> Forest land. He indicated that Duke does not object to any particular <br /> land use plan presented to date. The study will take into account how <br /> development may impact and how that fits in. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.