Orange County NC Website
Page 3 <br /> 6. ) Quality of workmanship is also a key issue. If the <br /> quality is low, call-backs would become a real time <br /> waster. <br /> 7. ) A problem related specifically to Orange County is <br /> the availability of contractors in our area. For <br /> the purpose of this report we considered only <br /> Hillsborough or Chapel Hill vendors for passenger <br /> car/light truck repairs. (To send the vehicle <br /> further on a routine basis would be time consuming <br /> as well as adding unnecessary miles to our <br /> vehicles. ) This would be a major consideration for <br /> Orange County since the vendor pool is so limited. <br /> We could easily create a monopolistic situation. <br /> 8 . ) Since Orange County has work hours outside the <br /> normal 8 : 00 a.m. - 5: 00 p.m. we would be very <br /> vulnerable when it came to emergency repairs. <br /> Currently a mechanic is on call so when a <br /> Sanitation truck or a Sheriff' s vehicle, Emergency <br /> Medical Service, etc. break down at 3 : 00 a.m. the <br /> repair can be taken care of quickly. <br /> 9. ) Orange County would, in its own best interest, <br /> require performance standards for repair vendors. <br /> With the increased work load, increased paperwork <br /> for billing, increased need for quality control <br /> the contractor would probably require additional <br /> personnel. He would pass that cost along to the <br /> County. <br /> 10. ) Governmental entities are afforded hugh discounts <br /> on items that are bid based on anticipated large <br /> volume. For example, the County purchases tires at <br /> about a 60% discount. The laws would not allow a <br /> private vendor to receive that price, however, so <br /> we would lose that advantage. <br /> 11. ) As a final note, it was called to our attention <br /> that it is much easier to close down an operation <br /> than it is to gear up to full speed again. The <br /> vendor realizes that and may "cut a deal" the first <br /> year to make the savings look enticing. However, <br /> the cost does indeed ebb upwards as time goes on <br /> and your options are more limited since it would <br /> generally require a large capital expenditure to <br /> reopen in-house operations. During the course of <br /> researching this subject we spoke with entities <br /> that no longer felt that contracting was their best <br /> deal, but to restock and restaff maintenance <br /> facilities would be staggering to their budget. <br /> The past five years have seen a growth in fleet size from 79 in 1981 to <br /> 125 vehicles in 1987. Not only has the number of vehicles increased but <br /> likewise the complexity of repair work. For example, five years ago we <br /> maintained four C.A.T. busses, in 1987 we maintain a fleet of nine; in <br /> 1981 we maintained five ambulances, in 1987 there are seven on the <br />