Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 04-15-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:11:35 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 9:36:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
%fir142 <br /> Ora •r (gaunt!" 3drrreattnn anti parka i e?urtutrui �-. i■�'a <br /> ti <br /> 300 West Tryon Street . l�.i.' �' t� <br /> HILLSBOROUGH. N.C. 27278 Life.Be In it. <br /> • <br /> iilay Anne Black, Dirccwr : I <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> 1:9] .)7-2E-2.11W <br /> TO: Jane Garrett, Planner Q-Zt,'S'1 <br /> FROM: Mary Anne. 31ack '7/x <br /> DATE: February t3, 1987 <br /> RE: Courtesy ...,aview --- Elm Grove <br /> Eno River Estates <br /> .1 Esoderrick Division <br /> ELM GROVE <br /> Upon review of the preliminary plan for the proposed Elm Grove <br /> Subdivision, I find that the, only element warranting comment from a <br /> recreation and park perspective is the subject property's location (a) in <br /> the JPA and (b) on or near the New Hope Creek watekway. The owners have <br /> indicated to me hat the.property is not in the New Hope Creek floodplain <br /> and if this i the case, I would recommend that the County accept <br /> payment-in-lieu of dedication of land for public recreation, in that the <br /> property does not,contain lands for future park or greenway sites. <br /> ENO RIVER ESTAT ' - <br /> The only el It of this proposed subdivision preliminary plan is its <br /> proximity to Orange and its location on the Eno River. Both these <br /> water resources are valuable recreation resources as well. I would <br /> request that the County pursue the possibility of the owner (a) donating <br /> that portion of "As is property which lies within the 100-year flood plain <br /> to the County, o.. (b) granting a(n) (conservation) easement on that same <br /> portion to the Coanty. I would be willing to explore these options with <br /> the owner if the. Board so desires. The County Attcrney would, of course, <br /> need to be invoL_d in such negotiations. <br /> ESODERRICK DIVISI:N <br /> I find no elc `nt on the preliminary plan warranting comment from a <br /> recreation and park perspective in that the subject property's location <br /> is not within the JPA or planning jurisdiction of Hillsborough. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to offer these staff comments. I will <br /> present my recor.-endations to the Orange County, Recreation and Parks <br /> Advisory Council at their March meeting and will forward to you any <br /> changes/additions comments they may have. <br /> I , <br /> MAB/pb1 ;g <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Hillsborough, 732-9331 - Durham, 688-7333 • Chapel Hill, 968-4501 - Mebane, 227-2032 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.