Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-06-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 04-06-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:06:28 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 9:16:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/6/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 ? <br /> TO: Orange County Board of Commissioners <br /> FROM: Technical Review Task Force - Telephone <br /> Richard A. Helwiq, Chair <br /> DATE: Thursday, April 2, 1987 <br /> TOPIC: Proposed reply to NC Utilities Commission docket P-89, SUB <br /> 23 Long Distance Failures During April, 1986, replies to <br /> company comments on our request for corrective orders from <br /> the North Carolina Utilities Commission. <br /> The Telephone Technical Review Task Force respectfully submits to you its <br /> proposal for a reply to the third round of comments made by AT&T, Centel, <br /> and General Telephone, on our requests for specific corrective action . <br /> These comments were requested (ordered) by the North Carolina Utilities <br /> Commission (NCUC) . <br /> This proposed reply comes to you with the unanimous recommendation of <br /> the Task Force from its meeting of Wednesday, April 1, 1987. <br /> After both joint and separate filings by the three telephone companies <br /> through the NC Utilities Commission, and after meeting with eleven AT&T <br /> representatives, and with continual contact with Centel, the Task Force <br /> developed and substantiated several proposals for changes in the <br /> operating relationships and interconnections between the companies <br /> involved in the failure of long distance service to Orange County <br /> (Centel, General and AT&T) . The Orange County Commissioners submitted <br /> these proposals to the NCUC on October 23, 1986. The NCUC sought comments <br /> from each of the telephone companies on these proposals. And now we <br /> recommend to you yet another reply. <br /> These rounds of responses and replies should be drawing to a conclusion <br /> within the next several rounds. While it is possible that we may be <br /> asked to participate in a "ore-Hearing" conference, or a full Hearing on <br /> this matter it is more likely that our efforts will blend into other <br /> similar activities. It appears that the Regional Telephone Task Force of <br /> TJCOG is developing (and is likely to adopt) major sets of <br /> recommendations that will address most of the issues that we have been <br /> raising. <br /> The reply that we recommend to you includes a brief review of the issue, <br /> a clarification of viewpoint and then asks the NC Utilities Commission: <br /> 1) To keep all of our previous requests open. <br /> 2) To ask General Telephone, which serves eastern Orange subscribers, to <br /> respond to all previous questions as a Local Exchange Company, noting <br /> that General has responded only as a contractor between Centel and AT&T. <br /> 3) To order Centel and AT&T and General and AT&T to develop practical <br /> plans and budgets, for complete review, for implementing fault-tolerant <br /> and self-healing networks through their class 5 office levels. <br /> 4) To request progress reports on studies AT&T has initiated as . <br /> outlined in its response of August 28, 1986. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.