Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
y,•i <br /> i 33 <br /> The lo y other zoniz , strict applied <br /> be Nd.� that could be a ad g: <br /> NC-2 or �e .., r <br /> !fir d Commercial . dist <br /> d3. district. <br /> district permits 200 to,400: trips, per da i g ardiriance Y• The Zoni has a li,mtation of five acres in 9 <br /> activity node, and there are already 4• any rut <br /> j' `^ y 35 acres zoned f <br /> NC-2 purposes leaving only about two-thirds of an acre <br />:"� .. hich could be used for that purpose. <br /> s, <br /> Collins continued, noting that if the rezoning request <br /> was approved, Planning Staff would be required, throug <br /> the Zoning Ordinance provisions limit the building siz <br /> based on the amount of traffic gcreratior proposed. 1 <br /> Steve Yuhasz inquired how many of the uses listed ror NC ' <br /> 2 would generate less than 200 trips per da <br /> explained that it would depend on the size of llth <br /> business. <br /> Vernon Davis indicated his desire to speak in favor <br /> the rezoning request rd o <br /> g qu st because - of a ne=dto,r a hardware <br /> store in the area but expressed a" need for turning lanes <br /> at the intersection of NC 54 and <br /> Danzinger expressed support White Cross Road. Rand <br /> neighborhood business. pPort for the h, of such a <br /> County Attorney, Geof Gledhill cautioned the Planning <br /> Board and Commissioners not to Consider the specific use <br /> in a rezoning request unless it is a Special Use Permit <br /> application. There is no power in a general rezoning to <br /> require on-site improvements. <br /> Commissioner Carey inquired about the reduction 1 '1' <br /> building size needed to accommodate the tri geeration <br /> allowed in the zoning district. Collins responded that <br /> the Health Department comments received were based on a1 <br /> building size of 9600 square feet. A reduction of <br /> building size by half would be needed. <br /> 071 5 SUB SION TIO S AMEND S <br /> a. <br /> Section IV-B-8 Landscaping and Buffer Requirements <br /> Presentation by Marvin Collins. <br /> On December 6, 1986, the Board of Commissioners suspended <br /> enforcement of Section IV-B-g_c_ <br /> 1 of the Subdivision <br /> Regulations <br /> pending further study of standards requiring <br /> installation of plant materials in building setback <br /> and on parcels designated for recreation/open space use. <br /> Concern had been expressed by land owners and developers <br /> about the high cost of complying .. with the standards. <br /> Clarification of application was also required. <br /> The Planning Board Ordinance Review Committee has been <br /> working with a developer, forester and landscape arch- <br /> itect in reviewing the design standards. The <br /> revisions represent changes to Section IV_B-8 propose-'-a <br /> as <br /> cable to new subdivisions. <br /> pplili <br /> 191 <br />■ <br />