Orange County NC Website
I . •.. <br /> �l <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> HILLSBOROUGH <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> cib(ana yci's glum _sta6Ccsf ad 7752 <br /> MEMO <br /> ID : Board of County Commissioners <br /> FR M: Ken Thompson, County Manager <br /> DATE: October 12, 1982 <br /> RE: Revised. Water and Sewer Extension Policy <br /> At its meeting on May 19, 1982, the Board reviewed a draft water and sewer <br /> extension policy prepared by staff. The policy set forth its intended purpose, <br /> the information to accompany a request to the County Manager for funding, a <br /> number of criteria to be used in selecting projects for funding, a loan/pay- <br /> back revolving fund financing arangement, advocated County ownership of major <br /> utility extensions and proposed oversizing of utilities to serve additional <br /> surrounding development. <br /> At the meeting there was discussiRn of the loan/payback scheme and the <br /> Board directed staff to send the proposed policy to the Institute of Govern- <br /> ment and the County Attorney for reviq Those two par s have now completed <br /> their review. <br /> In addition staft4f ha done furt ork on thy, ''nd the document has <br /> been revised to re��t t iK addition "` ' <br /> a� nformation?, c ,, <br /> Section I (c)3Ka : ed �A"`n- clea zx..�e#e. ing as well as new <br /> commercial and i d `" r" �` ~'"' <br /> n - .mjadyan � .'" °•tc.is policy. Section <br /> III (d) has been ,d -; 'd r: �`;�'-" =-. i P <br /> Alternative. , -= --' .r „`- isseon on Women. <br /> �r1 p p?jec s. ale gp y{ x he latest draft <br /> as a starting p rs 1 <br /> w-... A ti _, �- s�u� �td.on IVA (alterna- <br /> tive A) has new ii gt ( ' i '"" ' e <br /> �.��;��t�s �t�'C �ig"inn -��� ��;�for water and <br /> sewer ext ens ions�� �:.•�`., ,��'Y•"�1" - �;-.,_,� `� , , .. <br /> tip. J <br /> ! �,,DP€ ; . � s:-±0 =T�c n *.il `;,by the increased <br /> tax base and tar e e� '" <br /> ---�-�.-�-.�.-� Y....: ��::�i�� �~ t'rmany towns and <br /> counties in North �'a=: ;x ,-eet:. Tea; -}ae,; iteria for approv- <br /> ing a project is whether the development when completed will return taxes equal- <br /> ],ing or exceeding the County's investment in water and sewer lines. The required <br /> minimum payback period ranges from three to ten years in the policies reviewed <br /> by staff. In the proposed Orange County policy, payback through increased tax <br /> revenues is not a criteria for approving a project but is used to limit County <br /> funds spent on any one project. <br /> Section IVB (alternative B) is the loan/payback funding arrangement con- <br /> tained in the policy reviewed on 5/19/82. Wallace Harding has reviewed the <br /> policy and advises that Counties cannot be in the business of loaning money. <br /> Language has been changed to allow the County to lease to a developer utilities <br /> it has constructed with its funds. <br /> /dg <br />