Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-10-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 03-10-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 3:42:42 PM
Creation date
9/27/2016 3:19:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/10/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 <br /> that development will only be allowed when public <br /> facilities sufficient to support the development are <br /> present. In light of the policy that public facilities <br /> should not be extended into the Rural Buffer, allowing <br /> development only when public facilities are present <br /> would constitute a ban on development. That is not the <br /> intent of the Rural Buffer . A further problem exists. <br /> Linking development to the availability of public <br /> facilities infers that those facilities will eventually <br /> be provided. This could create the impression that the <br /> Rural Buffer will eventually be allowed to develop at <br /> suburban or urban densities . That is not the case. So <br /> linking development to the availability of public <br /> facilities may actually have a negative effect on the <br /> Rural Buffer . <br /> Municipal Service Pricing <br /> This is both a revenue production and _growth management <br /> technique. it attempts to influence development loca- <br /> tion by charging higher fees for development in unwanted <br /> areas. For example, within an area where a public <br /> service is available, a higher fee, say a tap fee for <br /> water, would be charged to a development that is not <br /> next to an existing developed area. The fee would be an <br /> incentive for compact development patterns. This <br /> technique suffers shortcomings similar to those <br /> described above under Adequate Public Facilities. A <br /> public service must be provided before the fee can be <br /> charged. Since public services such as water and sewer <br /> are not to be provided in the Rural Buffer, this is not <br /> a viable implementation measure. <br /> Impact Fees <br /> This is a revenue production technique. It shifts some <br /> of the cost of public services and facilities required <br /> by development to the development itself . Since it does <br /> not control development, it would not be effective in <br /> achieving the Rural Buffer. Special legislation would <br /> be required for Orange County to charge impact fees. <br /> Impact/Performance Zones <br /> This innovative type of zoning replaces the traditional <br /> zoning restriction-by-use with restrictions based on <br /> standards that measure the impact created by a proposed <br /> change in land use. Any use that meets the standards <br /> set for a zone is permitted. This provides more flexi- <br /> bility in permitted development. It does not appear <br /> that this would be more effective in implementing the <br /> Rural Buffer than the conventional zoning currently in <br /> use. <br /> Performance Systems/Points Systems <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.