Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-10-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 03-10-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 3:42:42 PM
Creation date
9/27/2016 3:19:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/10/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
91 <br /> HISTORIC SITES AND AREAS <br /> I. DATA <br /> The history of Orange County is not confined to its <br /> towns. Within the Rural Buffer are three State recognized <br /> historic buildings. over one dozen cemeteries that can be <br /> considered historic. and at least thirty archeological sites. <br /> Age, family or church association, and use status all <br /> have bearing on whether a cemetery is historically <br /> significant. North Carolina General Statutes provide some <br /> level of protection for all cemeteries and all but six in the <br /> Rural Buffer have some conditions attached to them that <br /> provide an additional level of protection. Those conditions <br /> include current usage. church ownership. or location in the <br /> Duke Forest. Two other abandoned cemeteries (abandoned merely <br /> indicating they are no longer in use) are surrounded by fully <br /> developed subdivisions. <br /> The most numerous historic sites in the Rural Buffer are <br /> archeological sites. Their protection is also the most <br /> problematic as the Archeology Branch of the Division of <br /> Archives and History does not consider their location public <br /> record. There is a fear that public knowledge of the sites <br /> could lead to their destruction by scavengers and state law <br /> allows for the withholding of information on location. Of the <br /> thirty-one known sites in the Rural Buffer six are in the <br /> Southern Triangle. five are in the University Lake watershed. <br /> and twenty are in Chapel Hill Township to the north of Chapel <br /> Hill. Two of the sites north of Chapel Hill have been <br /> recorded by the State as fully destroyed. both by the <br /> construction of I-40. One other site is recorded as partially <br /> destroyed by residential development. <br /> Two of the three buildings. Poythress House and <br /> Blackwood House, are private residences. The third is <br /> Damascus Congregational Church. None of the buildings are <br /> National Register sites. <br /> II. ISSUES/IMPLICATIONS. <br /> These sites are important to the heritage of Orange <br /> County. They are historical and educational resources and are <br /> deserving of some level of protection. The issue is how <br /> _ development can occur in a way that prevents these sites from <br /> being destroyed or desecrated. <br /> The issue is most problematic for archeological sites. <br /> The state. as a rule. will not provide information to the <br /> general public on the exact location of sites. This makes it <br /> very unlikely that individual landowners or developers will <br /> be aware of sites on a particular piece of property. Even <br /> though a list of sites in Orange County is on file at the <br /> Planning Department. it is also unlikely the Planning <br /> Department staff is aware of sites in relationship to <br /> particular properties being developed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.