Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-10-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 03-10-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 3:42:42 PM
Creation date
9/27/2016 3:19:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/10/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5; <br /> SOIL STABILITY <br /> I . DESCRIPTIVE DATA <br /> Soils was one of the three environmental parameters <br /> addressed in the preparation of the Joint Planning Land Use <br /> Plan. 40 soil types were identified in the Joint Planning <br /> Area using the Soil Survey of Orange County_ <br /> Four constraining factors were evaluated . These were <br /> slope, plasticity (shrink-swell) , depth to bedrock, and depth <br /> to groundwater. Slope(s) is expressed in percent, i .e., <br /> ( rise/ run) x 100. Plasticity is expressed in terms of a <br /> numeric index . In the evaluation, soils with a Plasticity <br /> Index (PI) > 30 were viewed as having moderate constraints <br /> and those with a PI > 55 were rated as posing severe con- <br /> straints to development . Depth to bedrock is expressed in <br /> inches and soils where the average depth to rock was < 24" <br /> were rated severe. Depth to groundwater (GW) is expressed in <br /> feet and soils where the depth was < 2 ' were viewed as posing <br /> problems . <br /> Evaluation of soils was done by pairing the constraining <br /> factors (except for bedrock < 24" which stood alone) as <br /> follows : S < 5 and PI > 30, S < 5 and PI > 55, and S > 10 <br /> and GW < 2 . The constraints were combined with the 40 soil <br /> types in a matrix . Soils that did not possess any of the <br /> above factors received a score of zero and were rated as <br /> posing "slight" Limitations. Any soil that possessed one of <br /> the four constraint pairings was rated as posing "moderate" <br /> limitations . Soils having two or more of the constraint <br /> pairings were rated as posing "severe" constraints to devel- <br /> opment . <br /> II . QUANTITATIVE DATA <br /> Acreages and percentages of moderate and severe soils <br /> relative to the Joint Planning Area were as follows: <br /> CLASSIFICATION ACREAGE PERCENT OF JPA <br /> Moderate 2,676 7% <br /> Severe 1 ,138 3% <br /> TOTAL 3,814 10% <br /> • III . ISSUES AND IMPLICATIONS <br /> Most of the soils coded as severe on the University Lake <br /> Watershed map were code incorrectly. These are Chewacla (Ch) <br /> soils and according to the evaluation matrix should have <br /> received a rating of "slight" . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.