Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
standards in effect prior to the adoption of the Rural <br /> Buffer standards and that the review be conducted in <br /> accordance with the policy. <br /> Jacobs indicated that a comma after the word "subdivi- <br /> sion" in #1 would make the meaning clearer. <br /> MOTION: Pilkey moved approval of the staff policy <br /> recommendation. Seconded by Best. <br /> Yuhasz asked if the list of minor subdivisions was <br /> inclusive of all affected by the proposed policy. <br /> Szymik responded affirmatively. <br /> Yuhasz indicated that there was a date of last activity <br /> but no date of first activity. <br /> Jacobs asked if the first date was available. <br /> Szymik indicated that the list included all minor <br /> subdivisions submitted in 1985 and 1986 affected by the <br /> proposed policy. He indicated that minor subdivisions <br /> were generally submitted by individuals, and they have <br /> a tendency to start and stop in the approval process. <br /> As an exampler he cited a case where he thought no <br /> activity was occurring but found an attorney had been <br /> working on a road maintenance agreement for several <br /> months. He indicated that was the reason for listing <br /> the date of last activity. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> Collins indicated to persons in attendance that the <br /> matter would be considered by the Board of Commis- <br /> sioners at its February 17, 1987 meeting. <br /> Ms. Regina Noblitt asked why one minor subdivision was <br /> able to be covered by the policy and not her proposal. <br /> Jacobs responded that the minor subdivisions on the <br /> list were submitted prior to the adoption of the two- <br /> acre standard on October 13. 1987. <br /> Y <br />