Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-02-1987 - Special Mtg.
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 02-02-1987 - Special Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 2:34:05 PM
Creation date
9/27/2016 1:48:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/2/1987
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: THE BOARD <br /> FROM: SHIRL <br /> DATE: 5 JUNE 1987 <br /> RE: SCHOOL BUDGETS: DATES; DECISIONS; POLICIES. <br /> Moses and I met with Sue Baker and Lindsey Efland as planned on 3 June. <br /> We will meet with both boards both times; dates are set at places when <br /> they are because of convenience to School Board Chairs. Lindsey suggested <br /> District Courtroom as the best place to be both able to sit around the <br /> table together and to have room for the public to observe. <br /> 17 June 7:30 pm District Courtroom <br /> 24 June 7:30 pm Lincoln Center. <br /> Conversation was not limited to setting a calendar. <br /> Frustration is high particularly because of lack of consultation with <br /> school administrators both before and after the budget is prepared as well <br /> as with complete silence on the issues important to the schools and left <br /> out of the budget. Particular unhappiness because at the request of the <br /> Manager, Gerry and Dan found time to set up a meeting with him to discuss <br /> the equity issue and then he cancelled out. On the other hand he reported <br /> to me that they would not talk with him. <br /> CONTINUATION BUDGETS: Once again the manager and the schools do not agree <br /> on the figures -- a special disappointment. My own conversations with <br /> the school finance officers near the end of last year's process showed me <br /> we were much closer to working in consort and willing to work out the <br /> issues than ever before. Repeatedly this year I have communicated to the <br /> Manager that the three entities MUST reach agreement before the budget is <br /> presented leaving the three Boards to talk of long and short range policy. <br /> Before referring the matter back to the administrators -- a path that has <br /> led to a mire of disagreement, no progress, charges and counter charges at <br /> our workshops, I have asked Sue and Lindsey to provide for me the major <br /> differences and identify how they have come to occur. These you will <br /> receive and we will decide the next steps from that information. <br /> BUS DRIVER PROBLEMS. An immediate critical operating issue for the <br /> schools that has not been addressed by funding or comment in our budget. <br /> IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR BUDGET COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS AND MOVEMENT <br /> TOWARDS REALISITIC MULTI-YEAR EXPECTATIONS FOR ALL BOARDS. <br /> [Here Moses and I spoke carefully for ourselves but expressed our feeling <br /> that the Board was generally in agreement with our feelings. ] <br /> 1. Each year the schools request in capital and program areas far <br /> more than the county, meaning the county citizens, are willing to fund <br /> from an annual ad valorem levy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.