Orange County NC Website
0 73 PAGE 18 <br /> DRAFT PBM 12-17-86 DRAFT <br /> VOTE: 9_ in favor. <br /> 3 opposed (Yuhasz. Best. Jacobs) . <br /> AGENDA ITEM <br /> #7c: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AMENDMENT <br /> (SECTION IV-B-1 LOT STANDARDS) <br /> Presentation by Marvin Collins. <br /> This agenda item is to consider approval of proposed, <br /> revisions to the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. <br /> This matter was presented at public hearing on November <br /> 24. 1986 . <br /> On October 13. 1986 . the Board of Commissioners adopted <br /> the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. including a <br /> minimum required lot size of two acres per dwelling unit. <br /> References within the Subdivision Regulations indicate <br /> that new subdivision plats submitted for approval must <br /> comply with the two-acre standard contained in the Land <br /> Use Plan. <br /> While such references exist, a direct statement to that <br /> effect is needed. Furthermore. Orange County's Subdivi- <br /> sion Regulations are enforced in the Town of Hillsborough <br /> and specific language is needed to indicate that lot <br /> areas for subdivisions within the Hillsborough planning <br /> jurisdiction must meet the stnadards set forth in the <br /> Hillsborough Zoning Ordinance. <br /> The proposed ordinance amendment recommends the following <br /> wording for the first sentence in the first paragraph of <br /> Section IV-B--1. <br /> "The minimum lot size shall be as required by the Orange <br /> County Land Use Plan. Orange County Zoning Ordinance or <br /> the Hillsborough Zoning Ordinance. whichever is applica- <br /> ble. " <br /> Approval of the amendment would clarify the application <br /> of lot size standards as contained in the Land Use Plan <br /> and Zoning Ordinance. <br /> No comments were made at the November 24 . 1986 public <br /> hearing concerning the proposed amendment. The Planning <br /> Department recommends approval of the proposed amendment <br /> to the Subdivision Regulations. <br /> MOTION: Pilkey moved approval. Seconded by Best. <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. <br /> 4 opposed (Walters. Lewis. Shanklin. Yuhasz) . <br /> Shanklin expressed concern with the wording "whichever" <br />