Orange County NC Website
043 6 ! <br /> 7. HAZEL M. COTTON asked about a situation in which she deeded to her <br /> son an acre of land but because of a problem with the right-of-way cant.- t <br /> get a building permit to move her sons trailer onto the one acre of land. <br /> Barry Jacobs explain d that without kn(lwing the entire situation, he <br /> could not .address t.-e problem. He infor: _••i her of the appeal procedures <br /> through the Board o_" Adjustment. <br /> 8 . BOB HOGAN expressed opposition to the proposal. He indicated that <br /> the proposal was not in the interest of the majority of people. He <br /> exp.esr;ed a concern that the watt.= :shed continue to be protected. <br /> 9. DICK HAVENS, Real Estate Broker, spke in opposition. He mentioned <br /> concern for the land that had been handed down through generations. e <br /> questioned the legality of attache-'ig such a regulation to land owned y <br /> individuals. <br /> 10. JOHN HODGES--COPPLE, 17:=.bitat for Humanity, expressed opposition to the <br /> proposal and expressed a concern for affordable housing. He agreed with <br /> keeping Chapel Hill and Carrboro away from Hillsborough. He feels there <br /> must be another solution for what the Board is trying to do. <br /> 11. CHARLOTTE THOMANN spoke in sup-pert of the twc• acre minimum lot size. <br /> She agreed that the undeveloped land should be kept to the minimum growth <br /> but that any pre-existing properties should be exempted from the two acre <br /> mil mum. Development is encroaching upon Orange County and she feels the <br /> pee ' i -1 who live in the County should be protected . The two acre minimum <br /> woL '' also help protect Duke Forest which hopefully will remain <br /> undeveloped to provide green space in the County. . <br /> 12 . J. BARRY WESTON, Civil Engineer specializing in land planning, <br /> emphasized that the minimum two acre lot size will significantly increase <br /> the price of lots. There are problems with water and sewer within those <br /> area already. The proposal will be unfair to those existing property <br /> own-.,1 r.s both large and small. It will be . unfair to prospective buyers <br /> brzcaue:e it will raise the cost of those lots. <br /> 13 . WILLIAM Hu..- CHINS, Falls of the New Hope, indicated that the vast <br /> majority of lane,e nets in that area desire the two acre minimum lot size. <br /> He :..-gated that six wells are already polluted making it difficult to have <br /> one acre lots. • <br /> 14 . PETE THORN, Homebuilder-s Association, spoke in opposition of the two <br /> acre minimum because it prohibits affordable housing. If water and sewer <br /> is not extended into the Rural Buffer most of the land will remain <br /> undeveloped because of the inability of the soil for septic tanks. He <br /> stated that unless the Rural Buffer is going to be set aside as a bedroom <br /> community, the two acre lot size does not make sense. _ <br /> 15. FORREST D. LOY owns one and one half acres and voiced opposition to <br /> the proposal. <br /> 15. LULA M. COTTON asked that the County Commissioners think about what. <br /> an acre of land costs. She asked that they let one acre stand. <br /> 17 . JOSEPH FEARRINGTON spoke in opposition to the proposal. He wants the <br /> propo;,al changed to one acre lots. <br /> 18 . GROVER WEBB of the Orange Grove Community strongly opposed the two <br /> acre proposal. <br />