Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Utilities E _ <br /> The developer is proposing individual well and septic tanks. We do not have <br /> evidence that each newly created lot would be suitable for individual wells and <br /> septic tanks. - <br /> A soils analysis by Ron Holdway of Orange CauntyilealthDepartmunat on April 2, <br /> 1986 showed three low pressure pipe system sites approved of six sites checked. <br /> One low pressure site had been approved. November 26, 1985 by Ton Kaasler. <br /> Three lots tested were unsuitable for septic systems, according to theme <br /> • County Health Department. Two lots of the three-lot subdivision, Stacy H.°-ig::ts <br /> Section I, were determined to be unsuitable for septic system: by the Orange <br /> County Health Department. Stacy Heights, Section 1 was approved by the Orange <br /> County Commissioners on January 6, 1986. <br /> According to Orange County planning staff, Stacy Heights, Section 1 on 'the west <br /> side of Rogers Road and the land now proposed as Stacy Heights, Section-3U ware <br /> combined in early 1986 to remedy an illegal subdivision by -deed split in April, <br /> 1985. Stacy Heights, section I subdivision has not been recorded at Orange. <br /> County Land Records. - <br /> . <br /> Since this proposal falls within the urban transition area we believe it should. <br /> be served by public water and sewer. Water and sewer lines should.either be <br /> extended, or the development should be delayed until they are available to the <br /> sits. - <br /> Recorame.ndation <br /> Planning Staff: That the Planning Board recommend that the Council adopt a <br /> resolution recommending that the Orange County Commissioners deny the applica- <br /> tion (see Resolution A). <br /> Resolution B would recommend that the application be approved. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> ..� _ <br />