Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-16-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 12-16-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 2:01:37 PM
Creation date
9/27/2016 10:56:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/16/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i. <br /> r•Form FMNA- �C 1942-19 - • • <br /> ,December 1.. 1984 - - . <br /> UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE <br /> FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION . <br /> ATTACHMENT I to FORM FmNA 1942--19 . <br /> HED'IAN FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL - <br /> ENGINEERIt:G SERVICES . <br /> AS A FERCEt:TAGE OF NET CONSTRUCTION COST . . - . . <br /> NORTH CAROLINA . <br /> The fees are to be adjusted to suit special conditions stated in the <br /> contract. -- <br /> Table I fee _schedule may be used for that portion of a construction <br /> project which is unusually complex- such as a water treatment plant (surface - <br /> or ground water) , wastewater treatment plant , wastewater collection and <br /> interceptor liner, , water or wastewater pump stations , design of constructed <br /> in place clear Wells , intake structures , rehabilitation of an existing <br /> treatment facility , and appurtenant work to above (electrical , HVAC, etc.) . • <br /> Table II -ordinurily will apply to -all. other design nor*, such as water <br /> lines , 1..:11s , minor water tre.tttv.-! :t <br /> tanks and foundations , and manufacturer or contractor designed clear wells • <br /> (metal or concrete) - <br /> • . All c;;,struction contracts wi_hin each table grouping will he tatalo3 . <br /> prior to applying the fez percentzas • . <br /> Table I Table II • Table III <br /> Total Actual 7- X - I • <br /> • <br /> Fee Fee Fee <br /> Construction- Cost _ <br /> 100 ,000 1f.:.3 8-6 7 .0 <br /> 200,000 9.3 7 .9 6.0 <br /> 300,000 8.7 - 7 .5 5.0 - • <br /> • 400,000 u.4 7 .2 4.5 <br /> 500 ,000 8.0 6.9 4.2 - - <br /> 600,000 7.8 6.7 4.0 - <br /> 700,000 7 .6 6.5 3.8 - <br /> 800,000 7.4 6.4 3.7 <br /> • 900,OD0 7.3 6.3 3-5 <br /> • 1,000,000 7_2- 6.2 3.4 <br /> 2,000 ,000 6_.7 5.8 2.5 <br /> 3,000,000 -6.4 • 5.5 2.1 • - <br /> 4 ,000 ,000 • 6.2 5 .2 . 1.9 <br /> 5 ,000,000 5.9 5.0 1.7 <br /> 10 ,000 ,000 5.7 4.8 1.5 <br /> 15 ,000,000 • 5 .6 4.7 1.4 <br /> 20 ,000 ,000 5.5 4.6 1.3 . <br /> The fee for ,project costs falling between the figures choun in rbove <br /> tables shall be interpolated to nearest one--:lundredth of one percent. <br /> Compensation may be negotiated on a lump-Gum basis for all projects . <br /> casting $100 ,000 or lycn . - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.