Agenda - 12-01-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

063 2.1 VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Motion was made by David Shanklin, seconded by Steve Yuhasz to approve positive findings for all of Article 8.2.4. VOTE: Unanimous, MOTION: Motion was made by David Shanklin, seconded by Steve Yuhasz to approve positive findings for all of Article 7.14 items. Barry Jacobs questioned a finding of "yes' on Article 7.14.3a)3) relating to visibility in C)9‘1\l ' 1 accordance with Article 6.8 but an inadequate site distance is mentioned. Marvin Collins indicated that the site distance is inadequate according to the DOT standards. If the • speed limit was decreased to 45 mph it would increase the site distance to comply with DOT standards. Collins also noted that Article 6.8 referred to sight distance standards in the Zoning Ordinance with which the applicant complies. • Barry Jacobs suggested adding this as a condition. VOTE: Unanimous, MOTION: Motion was made by David Shanklin, seconded by • Sharlene Pilkey to approve positive findings of Article 6.24 and 6.12. Note: Peter Kramer left the meeting at 9:45. • VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Motion was made by Steve Yuhasz, seconded by David • Shanklin to approve findings in agreement with the Staff on Article 5. Dimensional requirements and recreational space ratios were discussed. Section 6.12 deals with supplementary regulations for planned developments, The minimum required recreational space ratio as shown is as based on the old standard. It was subsequently amended in accordance with the new standard. The recreational space requirement is .299. The payment-in-lieu requirement will satisfy this minimum standard, VOTE: Unanimous. - Note: Carl Walters left the meeting at 10:00. • MOTION: Motion was made by Sharlene Pilkey, seconded by Steve Yuhasz to approve Staff recommendations for Article 6.24 a, c, d, e and f.