Agenda - 12-01-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

111 • O '2 10 Betty Margison asked about installation of the lines in a timely manner to serve the project, and Collins indicated they may install a pump station to serve one portion of the project at a time and change it out as the project is expanded. Sharlene Pilkey questioned a comment made by the Chapel Hill Town Council in which they indicate • VAY 1 that proposed development is inappropriately located with respect to pattern and timing of existing and proposed development in the Comprehensive Plan. . Pilkey indicated they are calling , for Mixed-Use development in the area and asked the difference in the timing and pattern in the Chapel Hill proposal and the County 0-1•designation which will also need sewer and water service. Collins indicated that there is not that much distinction in terms of the pattern of development because the Countyls 0-I designation and the Town's Mixed Use designation are similar. Collins further explained the phasing as related to the traffic patterns and the completion of 1-40. FINDINGS OF FACT MOTION; Motion was made by Sharlene Pilkey, seconded by David Shanklin to approve a positive finding of fact on Section 8.6, 8.8A - 1-12 with the exception of 3. VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Motion was made by Steve Yuhasz, seconded by David Shanklin to approve the findings of fact related to Article 20.3 the same as those approved by the Staff. VOTE: Unanimous. Barry Jacobs questioned the findings of fact of Section 7.4.1 indicating he recalled the concerns that were expressed by citizens in Northwood. Steve Yuhasz indicated that what was heard was conjecture. There cannot be a development of this size anywhere that would not have a traffic impact on the neighborhood. Betty Margison indicated there is a problem now and this development will only compound the situation. MOTION: Motion was made by David Shanklin, seconded by Steve Yuhasz • to approve positive findings of Article 7.4, 7.4.1, 7.4.2, and 7.4.3.