|
-' accordance,- with Section ,14 ~of the Ordinance, if :this lot r`'', - '',
<br /> abutted another `lot of record held in the -same ownershi, ,
<br /> such lots would need . to ' .be combined Or recombined as• ,
<br /> necessary to form: a conforming lot or lots and could not
<br /> thereafter be subdivided except in compliance with all-
<br /> requirements.
<br /> Furthermore, if the_ house- ,on this lot did not meet the'
<br /> . setback requirements of the new .zoning district, ,it. :
<br /> have nonconforming.. features: An addition to the. house. could ': ;.`
<br /> not be built- if that addition, did not conform to 'the_ appli,_: - :-,;` ::
<br /> - .„ :cable ' setbacks: for the new .district,.,;t - :•tlie house: urned''.d t' .(Section 4 a)
<br /> -,- e: b own •'it could .t af. , v-
<br /> :; not-'be rebuilt '-, ,1*• ,.
<br /> :v.Z ri S sib
<br /> .. u location ection.::1 i.l in.• t p e '� , ..�..
<br /> ,ze est 'a• �.4.2.b) :: It':would. 'bed p4 1 't-..8`��.�'"
<br /> ,., qu va arice-. he' _ s e e _': ':�r
<br /> ';,:,,. : - a:. : from t - Boar - • ' � � .�a'M::
<br /> :- �F�-r'. � �;��:s�tbacks; .;-i.f .'compliance o- :of.--Adatis#�.erit.s,•-`.:from . ._:_k:ti -,. ,-
<br /> `, - p iance with- the . - ere 'ii--,_.._
<br /> :"-;'•; _ :,,.: not• reasonabl\�•possible (Section .2.3) 8 able. ,'setbacks.'were 'f �`:�"
<br /> ; .� ( ction: 14.2 - :1-`:., �.. ::'r..
<br /> :,,
<br /> :�.. _. .... .•�, �:•:..,5< .4}.i%tro�:ti:: v;u,'.� - :'Y:: _ - .� �:• ,. - -r'<:c:t .:•- .s +�ifr;,
<br /> )
<br /> »Y. 5
<br /> Examen ' � :
<br /> .-. ';l:p;, :act .;.r. : _ :: � _ -_ �. -- -
<br /> - - Vi '
<br /> if 'Y. - _ _-
<br /> `i '��
<br /> f -
<br /> 0
<br /> l: F
<br /> t -were :, •�..
<br /> 'lawfully created^ ';
<br /> . -gross. land -area a ,with •26,,0.00 square �feet• `of;- , ;: '`-_...:'
<br /> And the house 'included an accessory " -~.:' ' -
<br /> - ' .ment ' (Section•,':;18.38) , 'then • a new zoning apart- •:- ::-4
<br /> ::. minimum lot:; size :of 25,000 square feet gross land area: would - } '`::'
<br /> .•.::render this::ra::, nonconforming lot.,--,r The - minimum. 'gross :land ,• - #
<br /> ` area required.- family-fam ly dwelling -on- a lot established ~:'
<br /> :. prior to danuar shed
<br /> ::: piior t • y '' 13, 1986 is 25,500 in the R-1 .:zoning - .
<br /> iii accordance with Section .5.5.2 •of the Ordinance., - , . :::` ` .
<br /> :',`The minimum • gross ~: land_ area required. 'for a two-family.
<br /> [ dwelling is,.-one . arid-• one-half (1.5) :times the minimum gros ''
<br /> land area established. A new district 'with a minimum
<br /> :-'land area of : 25,000 ..for a single family lot' would require
<br /> , 37,500 square--`feet of gross - land area for , a two-family y
<br /> However,' if the lot were created after January 13, 1988, the .'..-
<br /> minimum gross land area would be ' in accordance ' with 'the',maximum number of dwelling units per acre of
<br /> established : in Section 5.8. gross land imum
<br /> R-1 - currently has a `maximum:'':: ` ;A,
<br /> .:density of '3 units per acre.- . If this number• . applied, to a - .
<br /> new zoning district, the minimum gross': land area . would be `: :`1-_'
<br /> 29,040 square feet for 2 dwelling units.
<br /> In either case this lot with 26,000 square feet would not-
<br /> comply with the minimum 'requirements for a two structure. When a nonconforming lot cannot be, combined 1or, --
<br /> recombined with other lots to form a conforming lot or lotsf
<br /> - the lot may still be used. However, the structure could not
<br /> be rebuilt as a two-family structure if it burned down
<br /> (Section 14.2.3) . Furthermore, if the house on the 26,000
<br /> square feet lot did not already have an accessory apartment,
<br /> then one could not be added after the effective date of a
<br /> -8-
<br />
|