s density, of 1 unit' per;.2 acres.. We believe that those areas south
<br /> . of Town, within the Town's zoning. jurisdiction, designated• on the
<br /> Land Use Plan as Rural Residential' should be rezoned. from R-1. to •
<br /> Rural ' Transition (RT) which requires a minimum lot =. size of
<br /> • 100,0.00 square' feet ',gross .land area (approximately 2;•3 .acres) ® -
<br /> Culbeth R at Smith
<br /> S r " oad Level Road: .
<br /> , •
<br /> On ,the:' south •side of Cuibreth, :Road„ near' the Smith, Level 'Road.- '
<br /> • intersection •there 'is a small area' zoned,' •Residential4' '(imaximu�` : -
<br /> - density.~.,'.of 10 ''units .,per..:acre) . • This .urea ..is designated:. as •.low:,.'.,..::...
<br /> ,,,.;.:-:.'.:,:...:,:,•,...,,.. ..density residential ..;•(0-4:• unit_s per_,sorer,. Uzi-_.the..:t acid-='r'CTSe';�Plan. :: ,5
<br /> 4.; 'zonin on°' the„The,,.yR g. -'south• ad-. .4 ;.
<br /> _ ,; :�;. � side� ;of•: Culbreth '.RO w �_ '..:>t-�:
<br /> _ _ Ti-�Leve3;�r,.;,Road �sh ,'near k�Smith:,"�:-,:�;:
<br /> . ve.1 ould . be:'-changed•-.'to •_R 2'': . maxi t '_:
<br /> .-r<.....;:•. 'A ie-)_.: to: reflect::',the'�::Land .r v:.:,.
<br /> .�.�.-� `�:-: Use .•Plan :c,esignatiaii ' _�- g ' � -- -
<br /> � :,. :�_. >a ,lido-� ��..a :=,�'-
<br /> . ' . •tion;,."for;multi-famll . d v, ,:, ~'c _ _ �.
<br /> t 1;r _. __ •J.. Y;,; �v lapment: on phis R-4•LL.tract•1. „. , sii. ._ :(`i-:
<br /> a.._� :and':•::reviewed.,'. `with re ��uests -:for :r •. , .z ted,r za s�
<br /> _:,t:.=� _ q - evisons _.dvirrng:;I�.�5: ��-�.�30��arevi�z�~=��=`���-:ti.
<br /> 1siozis.:;were ever 'made, •so h- •,. • i. �•
<br /> - ,K: ..- �•:� �' applicati:an :�:sdormaxit' � �. ;,;�.:�.,�;.... #:. -�::�.• •,•.::: - mot.^"' t't _ .
<br /> The: Oak
<br /> S;'II .-!ei hbo
<br /> �s
<br /> dry _ vif'b -
<br /> rX '
<br /> The •'Oaks �'TI' - - :�
<br /> n•eighiborhood south ~of E�;h - 4 a : - ,::�
<br /> • ,p esus"�C�iurch�.`'.Riaad'.�."his"t'. east*,..'.� _ ' :.:.
<br /> i. '' .of•.. the Briarcliff ,:,:neighborhood •-is .,designated -. as . :low •.densit i
<br /> . . , :,',- , ,residential. °A. single:, family, low •density subdivision,=:::the' .Oaks. :- ; '- :.,.
<br /> .= li;'..•-.has:':.been',.:approved° for -.,this area•':and'...is nbw beiinig.._: 'bui'lt: ,.- �:
<br /> • However s.
<br /> ,. , ,•.:•the 'zoning••niapstill'•reflects . several. areas 7.'of. R-4,-:.'and ' .rj:'`
<br /> - R-5 -.zoning.' : These. R• 4 and .R-5 designations. i.n the Oaks. II ''should . 'i" :` ',:
<br /> • 'be .changed to:-R-1". a n:::accordance with the Land- use Plan: •.This area •-?�:_ .-
<br /> could quali f for w.<':1
<br /> 1' a -:ne ow• density designation:,: ,.���... ,:,��w .��_�x:�y .�:;., ! '=.0•
<br /> -
<br /> The Area Behind .Brendle's
<br /> . .. ;on• Sage _Road: � • : . , ,.__ .. .. ..
<br /> Between the commercial',,•zo
<br /> ' zoning • of Brendle. s • and the .. Oreenfields
<br /> Planned Development-Housing, east of Sage Road, there is' an area
<br /> • zoned R-4 (maximum density of 10 units per acre) 'In 'accordance
<br /> . . '-' with the' Land Use Plan. designation- of:medium• •density (4-8) 'units . -• .• •--c
<br /> • . . . per acre) , the area should be rezoned from R-4- to „R.-2 'or: R-3
<br /> • . (maximum density' of '4 .units per acre) . . • .• ' •- _.. . • • ,
<br /> Laurel H �a Parkway• at::H; _'15-501 • •r: �.:�� ;.;x,::.:,•:
<br /> :- .�._
<br /> and Use Plan' deliggna'tes_ an``,area' at :the southeast. corner: 1.;
<br /> the proposed Parker Road and Hwy. 15-501 as high-density residen-
<br /> tial • (8-15 units/acre) • and medium • density. residential (4-8.
<br /> units/acre) .• : This area :is currently. zoned R-l. We believe .that '
<br /> • this area designated on the Land Use- Plan as 'high density should. `=
<br /> be, at some point in •time, rezoned from R-1 ,to R--4 (10 units per
<br /> acre) and the area designated as medium density be rezoned from-
<br /> R--1 to R-3 (7 units per acre) . However, timing is a 'key consider.-
<br /> • ation here. Laurel Hill Parkway is not built. US 15-501- has not
<br /> . been improved. Sewer is not• yet in• the area. We do. not recommend
<br /> rezoning at this time. • • •
<br /> .. •. -6- '. _
<br />
|