Orange County NC Website
the main purpose of initially supporting the two acre mini 9 <br /> was to maintain the rural character of the area. He noted that sthe <br /> interest of those homeowners in the Calavander area was in not seeing <br /> high density housing in the rural area. Another concern was that water <br /> and sewer not be extended out into the rural area because high density <br /> would follow. He suggested that one way to address these concerns would <br /> be to keep the one acre minimum lot size but to cluster developments so <br /> that open space would be provided and dedicate this open space to protect <br /> it from ever being developed. This would satisfy those Concerns <br /> expressed by those in attendance and those needs for affordable housing. <br /> This density would make it economically feasible to run sewer and water <br /> and provide other necessary services. <br /> 32. LARRY REID spoke in opposition to the proposal. <br /> 33 . ANN JOYNER, Cedar Grove Township, spoke on behalf of Dolly Hunter. <br /> She expressed concern that this regulation will cause developers to <br /> leapfrog and come out into the rural agricultural section of the County. <br /> 34. BOBBY GRIFFITH spoke in opposition to the two acre minimum lot size. <br /> He indicated he will have to pay double for the amount of land he <br /> will need in order to build a house. <br /> 35. MERRILL FISHER spoke in opposition of the proposal. <br /> 36. ROY STRAND stated that sewer should be extended as far as possible <br /> and the property to the west and north developed. <br /> 37. HENRY WELLS stated that water and sewer should be extended through <br /> the entire County wherever feasible. <br /> 38. CHARLES HIGH spoke in opposition to the two acre minimum lot size. He <br /> asked about the setbacks and Marvin Collins reiterated the dimensions. <br /> 39. DIANE RIGSBEE indicated she had been since June trying to get her <br /> plan approved by the Planning Staff. She has paid out $600 for a survey <br /> and would like to be able to move her trailer to her land. She felt it <br /> the responsibility of the Planning Staff to inform her of any changes <br /> that may affect her request. <br /> 40. WADE PARRISH spoke in opposition of everything proposed. <br /> 41. J. C. MCLAMB, resident of New Hope, stated it was not the place of <br /> any body of government to tell people what they can do with their land. <br /> 42. JOSEPHINE BYRD spoke regarding some land that was sold to pay the <br /> taxes. <br /> 43. HENRY WHITFIELD questioned why this proposal had to be returned to <br /> the Planning Board and why a decision could not be made tonight. Chair <br /> Willhoit explained the procedure in accordance with the Ordinance. <br /> Whitfield asked if a petition would be in order to request that the two <br /> acre lot requirement be dropped and asked that Collins draw up the <br /> petition for those in attendance to sign. <br /> e• ARTICLE 6 - A• •lication of Dimensional Re. irements 6. 16. 12 <br /> Tele•hone Exchan•es et. al. <br /> Collins presented for the receipt of public comment a proposed <br />