Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 11-17-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2016 9:24:11 AM
Creation date
9/27/2016 8:30:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k . s <br /> 10 <br /> approach zones. These approach zones must be kept clear of height <br /> obstructions according to specified FAA criteria. <br /> It is difficult to specify an exact size for an airport generally, <br /> since dimensions and size depend so much on topography and on de- <br /> cisions concerning ownership, easements and zoning. A site of about <br /> 1500 ft. x 6000 ft. , about 206 acres, is very desirable for the <br /> runway and facilities portion of an airport. <br /> ft. x 13,800 ft. , almost 800 acres, for rnwa , facilities aanduheight <br /> restrictions area, with about half of the 800 acres controlled by <br /> height easements and/or land use controls, rather than by fee simple <br /> ownership, has been suggested as a "worst case" scenario. <br /> Other site criteria are contained in FAA material and are not re- <br /> peted here. <br /> Economic Impact <br /> A general aviation airport can have considerable <br /> benefit to an area. The Task Force has not attempted economic <br /> such benefits for Orange County. However, for illustration, the Task <br /> Force includes as Appendix D a copy of an economic impact study of <br /> the DeKalb-Peachtree Airport in the Atlanta area. <br /> Orange County is not Atlanta and the DeKalb-Peachtree Airport is a <br /> long-established large general aviation airport, not an airport not <br /> yet in existence. The study should be read with those qualifications <br /> in mind; it is indicative of the potential benefits of a general <br /> aviation airport. <br /> Reliever Airport <br /> " • . . selected airports in metropolitian areas may also be desig- <br /> nated as "reliever" airports. Such airports are intended to provide <br /> for the general aviation aircraft which might otherwise have to use <br /> the major airport in the area. Since the larger airports are de- <br /> signed for commercial airline aircraft, and thus overbuilt for the <br /> general aviation aircraft, the reliever airport allows a more approp- <br /> riate matching of airport to aircraft. <br /> The term "reliever" is one which is authorized by FAA after a review <br /> of both the general aviation airport and the airline airport <br /> relieved. It is my opinion that the Orange County Airport ou to be <br /> reliever airport if it is so desired. Reliever tusou usually <br /> carries with it a higher priority for federal fundin and aditional <br /> impetus for FAA's providing communications and air navigational <br /> facilities for the airport. The decision on whether to seek reliever <br /> status is one which does not need to be made until well into the <br /> planning study. " <br /> This quotation is from an April 2, 1987 letter to the Task Force <br /> Chairman from Bruce Matthews Manager of Airport Development, NC DOT, <br /> Division of Aviatiom. John Brantley, RDU Aiort <br /> supported reliever designation for a well locat d generaloaviation <br /> airport in Orange County in an April 17, 1987 letter to the Task <br /> Force Chairman. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.