Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-18-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 11-18-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:16:21 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 4:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
—' '-' `~--' - '-'--- -- '— <br /> } <br /> 072' *tate ' f Nora Carolina • <br /> ; �� � <br /> =�� � ^ n +n^ent o� *ate Treasurer <br /> H*nmwc (Bp,'cs State and Local Government Finance Divi,96m <br /> TREASURER <br /> and the Local Government Commission JOHN 0. FOuT <br /> DEPUTY TREASURER <br /> November 7, 1986 <br /> Mr. Donald WillhOit, Chairman <br /> Orange Co. Board of Commissioners <br /> 203 Lexington Road <br /> Chapel Hill , North Carolina 27514 <br /> Dear Mr. W17lhni1: <br /> Each year the staff of the Local Government Commission reviews the annual <br /> audit reports of local governments. Again this year, the staff was . looking <br /> particularly for signs of financial and~ budgeting problems the <br /> within � |e <br /> report. <br /> • We want to bring to your attention certain problems which are reflected in <br /> your audit report. The sale of bonds and the interest rate obtained in the <br /> market is directly related to financial management. We feel improvement in <br /> the following areas could enhance your position in` "p <br /> the bond market: <br /> The NorthSideAenUvations Fund has a deficit which should be funded in the <br /> current fiscal year budget [G,S. I59-I3( 3)2], <br /> • <br /> We are particularly concerned about the recent trend in the percent of <br /> fund balance available for appropriation in the General Fund. The following illustrates this trend: <br /> FY ended June 30, 1884 - 16,2I percent <br /> FY ended June 30, 1985 - 8.87 percent <br /> FY ended June 30, 1986 - 3.96 percent <br /> The amount of fund balance available for appropriation has decreased to th e <br /> point where it is now less than 4% of the total expenditures in this fuUd <br /> Based upon our observation, tux-levying governmental units have cash flow <br /> ^ <br /> problems when the amount of fund balance available for opprVpriati0D drops <br /> below 8% of the actual expenditures for the year then ended. • <br /> The federal government has cut, and will continue to <br /> cut, <br /> the mount of support to local governments.. Therefore, an analysis of revenue for each local government is needed to det erm i ne what leYel of f <br /> u <br /> U hm7ance is appropriate. It is difficult <br /> for units of government to reduce <br /> Spending rapidly. The largest portion of variable costs is <br /> salaries, <br /> and d Most units reduce salary costs through attrition. Even if a unit was willinU Co terminate ewplVyeeS, most units are on direct reimbursement for <br /> r unempl ' -``t compensation. Therefore. employee costs may not be greatly for the first year after termination The need for building alarger fund balance is apparent. Plans for reducing costs in anticipation future cuts should be formulated now. <br /> mwN.Salisbury Street, Raleigh,North Carolina m:o1 (919) 733-8004 <br /> An Affirmative Aoum/Evu^/0n»^r�n �l�nr�xo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.