Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-18-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 11-18-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:16:21 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 4:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/18/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D* , T pa,M,VINUTES PAGE 17 <br /> • \ _ <br /> cgs4S, - 057 (3) That a landscaping plan be submitted showing <br /> A trees to be preserved upon project completion'? <br /> ‘§, ,c,,e1Ct • specifying their location and approximate size. <br /> -, e <br /> ,.... * % • Plans shall be prepared - d trs preserved in <br /> accordance with Section IVB8 • of the <br /> Subdivision Regulations. . <br /> (4) Show building setback 1' ,.es on individual lots. <br /> 4- <br /> MOTION S Best moved approval of three lots with Planning <br /> • Staffs conditions. Seconded by Kr- , . r. <br /> Shank lin noted that it seed more realistic to go <br /> for six lots as this would be the s' e of the <br /> surrounding lots. Jacobs tee that developments <br /> being completed in phases ._ . .uld not be begun ae, <br /> orte-acre lots - d completed as tw acre lots. <br /> Margison expressed concern . .t the Board should be <br /> . <br /> discussing property develop -nt in aggregate. <br /> 0 Jim Plymiree developer r explained that Mel Oaks <br /> would have preferred development in aggregate but <br /> they were unable to obtain the land at one time. <br /> . - <br /> Yuhasz noted that condition ti cold not be --t ai <br /> lots 15 and 16 have already been sold. - <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor. <br /> 6 opposed.•SECOND MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of six lots with conditions <br /> 2v 3 and 4. Seconded by Lewis. <br /> • VOTE: • 6 in favor. 0 <br /> 5 opposed. <br /> n. H• iTestea. Hills Phase xr - elimi -ry) <br /> • <br /> Presentatio by Garrett. - <br /> This agenda to is to consider approval of the <br /> Preliminary P .n for Homestead Hills Subdivision <br /> Phase II. <br /> . <br /> The property n question is located in Chapel it <br /> • Township on the north side of Ho -stead Road (SR <br /> 1777) . It is refe enced as Lot 278 of Tax Nap 109. <br /> All lots would have access to the existing Drew Lane <br /> and proposed Drew Lane Extension (public) . The <br /> • tract is bordered 0-, residential development . d <br /> proposed rec eationa property ned by • Orange• <br /> . . <br /> - <br /> - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.