Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 11-03-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 4:09:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ubt:. <br /> DRAFT JOINT PUBLIC HEARING PAGE 5 <br /> that facts about mobile home parks had been distorted. She <br /> indicated that she felt the mobile home park owner/operators <br /> deserved a grandfather clause without qualifications. She <br /> felt this would take care of discrimination against mobile <br /> homes. She noted that she is well pleased with the lot she <br /> has in a park. <br /> Joseph B. Supeano, mobile home owner/property owner, stated <br /> that he had moved to North Carolina from Connecticut and is <br /> well pleased with his home in. Joppa Oaks. He noted that <br /> restrictions in North Carolina were not as strict as those <br /> in Connecticut nor is the tax base in Orange County as high. <br /> He expressed concern with the possibility of new restric- <br /> tions being placed on existing mobile home parks. <br /> Forrest Heath, owner/operator of Ridgewood Mobile Home Park, <br /> stated that his park was begun in 1965 before zoning in <br /> Orange County. He noted that his park was approximately 25% <br /> completed when zoning was enacted. Three-fourths of the <br /> property of his park was zoned residential with only one- <br /> fourth being zoned mobile home park district. He explained <br /> the process he pursued to obtain a zoning change. <br /> He also reviewed the actions taken by the Board and. <br /> explained the court proceedings which he had to engage in to <br /> obtain the zoning change. He expressed concern with "retro- <br /> active" amend' ents, especially with the court process he had <br /> had to go through. <br /> Collins indicated that many valid considerations had been <br /> presented in regard to the standards. He noted that these <br /> represent the real reason that he is recommending further <br /> study of the standards. He noted that EMS and the Sheriff's <br /> Department had expressed concern with the lack of a <br /> numbering system in the parks and the width of some of the <br /> travelways. He stated that these considerations indicate to <br /> him that the Planning Board and Planning Staff and mobile <br /> home park owner/operators need to work together on standards <br /> which are realistic and equitable. <br /> Billy Bane Villinova expressed the concern that placing more <br /> restrictions on mobile homes would affect their affordabil- <br /> ity. fo dabil- <br /> ity. She encouraged the Board of Co"tissioners to listen to <br /> the col ents from mobile home park owner/operators and act <br /> accordingly. <br /> Bart Walters stated that . he has been a mobile home park. <br /> dweller for over five year and was only moving now due to I <br /> the fact that he had been able to save money to purchase <br /> property of his own. He indicated he felt the mobile home <br /> parks should be able to continue operation under the <br /> standards which were in effect at the time they were built. <br /> It was asked from the audience that the amendment be read in <br /> its entirety. Collins responded that there is not a text <br /> amendment per se in written form. If something is deleted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.