Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 11-03-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 4:09:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1 8 - <br /> 1-40 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONNAIRE. <br /> Please rank all possible answers when a ranking is <br /> requested and your response is not "no preference" or no <br /> • opinion." We are trying to determine a rank order. <br /> Opportunity exists elsewhere in the questionnaire to oppose <br /> any of the items being ranked. <br /> 1. Do you have any preferences as to what land uses should be <br /> located in the 1-40 corridor? Yes No No opinion <br /> If YES. please rank the following choices in the order of <br /> preference. 1 being highest. <br /> Open Space/Recreational <br /> Commercial <br /> Office and Institutional <br /> Manufacturing/Industrial <br /> . Residential <br /> Other (specify) <br /> 2. What types of land uses should be excluded or discouraged <br /> from the 1-40 corridor? Mark as many as applicable. <br /> Open Space/Recreational <br /> Commercial <br /> Office and Institutional <br /> • Manufacturing/Industrial <br /> Residential <br /> __Other (Specify) <br /> No land uses should be discouraged or excluded <br /> No opinion <br /> 3. Should all non-residential development be discouraged in <br /> the 1-40 corridor? Yes No No opinion <br /> If you answered YES please go to QUESTION 67 <br /> 4. There are four 1-40 interchanges in Orange County. How <br /> should non-residential development at each be approached? <br /> Please mark a response for each interchange. <br /> A. State Highway 86 (interchange A on the attached map) <br /> O non-residential development should be encouraged <br /> non-residential development should be discouraged <br /> • no opinion or unsure <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.