Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 11-03-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 4:09:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING_ DEPARTMENT' <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPt.ICATION: 2-7.86 (Rezoning Request )Allen and Doris Turner . <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION KATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING. STAFF ' <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT -THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS; <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE ZO - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" Indicates cam I I ance* "No" Indicates Honcomp3.1 ance, <br /> PLANNING STAFF PLANNING <br /> FININGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED-TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance'Requi rem.nts FINDINGS <br /> The app'llcation must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied in 'Art I ele 20 - Amend- <br /> ments. 'Those requi rements <br /> 1r�cTude1 <br /> 20.32 a) Map shc►wing affected Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes ko <br /> property at scale-of not less I"7I00' . <br /> than 1 10011 nor more than 1'- <br /> 201 <br /> 20.3R2 •b) Legal 4scription of %Yes No Description provided wl th appl I cation ; „Yes N No <br /> property <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged A Yes N No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, I f any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed condl bons, If Yes � No APPlicant cites GC-4 zoning on both sideses No <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- and across US 70 and I-85.as justification <br /> b i y necessary to promote public for zoning,change, The tract immodiately to the. <br /> health, safety and general welfare; east was -rezoned from R-1 to GC-4 on. 7-7-Q6'. <br /> 20.3.2 e} Manner In which proposed X Yes �o Property I s located Ina 2O Year - Yes �,� <br /> Transition Area and Commercial/ 1111-' <br /> amandment vii l I carry out purpose lndustr;al Node <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.