Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-03-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 11-03-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 4:09:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT P$M ;MINUTES PAGE 17 <br /> V�� .C4, (3) That a landscaping plan. ` be submitted showing <br /> i trees to be preserved upon project completion, <br /> b . specifying their location and approximate size. <br /> ° ` ➢' Plans shall be prepared and trees preserved in <br /> c'',.§.,. accordance with Section IV-B-8 of the <br /> Subdivision Regulations. <br /> (4) Show building setback lines on individual lots. <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval of three lots with Planning <br /> Staff's conditions. Seconded by Kramer. <br /> Shanklin noted that it see-ed more realistic to go <br /> for six lots as this would be the size of the <br /> surrounding lots. Jacobs noted that developments <br /> being completed in phases should not be begun as <br /> one-acre lots and completed as two-acre lots. <br /> Margison expressed concern that the Board should be <br /> discussing property development in aggregate. <br /> Jim. Plymire. developer, explained that Mel Oaks <br /> would have preferred development in aggregate but <br /> they were unable to obtain the land at one time. <br /> Yuhasz noted that condition fl could not be met as 1 1111 <br /> lots 15 and 16 have already been sold. <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor. <br /> 6 opposed. <br /> SECOND MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of six lots with conditions <br /> 2. 3 and 4. Seconded by Lewis. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor. <br /> 5 opposed. <br /> n. <br /> Homestea• Hills Phase it (Preliminary) <br /> Presentatlo by Garrett.. <br /> This agenda tem is to consider approval of the <br /> Preliminary P =n for Homestead Hills Subdivision - <br /> Phase II. <br /> The property n question is located in Chapel Hill <br /> Township on the north side of Hoftuestead Road (SR <br /> 1777) . It is I refe enced as Lot 27 of Tax Map 109. <br /> All lots wool ; hay- access to the existing Drew Lane <br /> and proposed Drew Lane Extension <br /> (public) .blic) . The <br /> tract is bor .ered residential development and <br /> proposed rec eationa property owned by Orange <br /> .. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.