Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 10-21-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:14:57 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 3:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> TO: Orange County Board of Commissioners <br /> FROM: Technical Review Task Force - Telephone <br /> Richard A. Helwig, Chair <br /> DATE: Monday, October 20, 1986 <br /> TOPIC: Proposed reply to NC Utilities Commission docket P-89, SUB 23 <br /> Long Distance Failures During April, 1986, requests corrective <br /> orders from the North Carolina Utilities Commission. <br /> The Telephone Technical Review Task Force respectfully submits to you <br /> its proposal for a reply to the second round of disclosure responses <br /> made by AT&T, Centel, and General Telephone, as ordered by the North <br /> Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) . <br /> This proposed reply comes to you with the unanimous recommendation of <br /> the Task Force from its meeting of Monday, October 20, 1986. <br /> After both joint and separate filings by the three telephone companies <br /> through the NC Utilities Commission, and after meeting with eleven AT&T <br /> representatives, and with continual contact with Centel, the Task Force <br /> has developed and substantiated several proposals for changes in the <br /> operating relationships between the companies providing long distance <br /> service to Orange County. <br /> The reply that we recommend to you asks the NC Utilities Commission to <br /> order these changes. <br /> The NCUC can accept our request and order the changes, or deny our <br /> request in whole or in part, or ask for further responses from the phone <br /> companies, or call for a hearing on the request, or withhold action <br /> pending other actions. For completeness, there are probably other <br /> procedural options also possible. <br /> Our proposed changes fall quite nicely in line with the direction that <br /> the Regional Telephone Task Force of the Triangle J COG seems to be <br /> heading. The arguments and specifications for our requested changes <br /> form a substantial foundation for the COG to build on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.