Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-21-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 10-21-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:14:57 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 3:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Telephone of the South, in its short filing of August 28, <br /> 1986, seems to disclaim any ability of its own to provide for the <br /> quality of its service to AT&T and Central, both of which contract <br /> with General for connections between subscribers and the long <br /> distance environment. General says that "Any such plan (s) <br /> [contingency and diversity] would need to be the responsibility of <br /> AT&T-C in concert with the involved local exchange companies." And it. <br /> cites that it "is restricted, by Federal Order, in its participation <br /> in the toll environment." <br /> We firmly believe that the above synopsis points to weak and confusing <br /> contractual relationships between the companies that bring about <br /> inadequate and unreliable service, contrary to standards set out both <br /> in State law and in Commission policy. One can only conclude that <br /> Central, General and AT&T each seem to believe that it is the others' <br /> primary responsibility to see that the subscriber has adequate and <br /> reliable long distance service. We see AT&T admitting its part of the <br /> problem and promising substantive modifications. We see Central and <br /> General focusing quite narrowly on the symptom, ignoring the bigger <br /> issue, that there -will be system failures and as local exchange <br /> companies, they must provide adequate and reliable service in a way <br /> that their service, and their access to other carriers' service, <br /> survives such kinds of failures; that access to a non-functioning node <br /> is not access at all. <br /> I. Therefore, we respectfully request that the North Carolina <br /> Utilities Commission order: <br /> 1) That Central and AT&T negotiate direct connections for - <br /> interLATA services and, if necessary, that Central be given the <br /> authority to construct facilities for direct connection to AT&T's <br /> Point of Presence, even if that Point of Presence is not located <br /> in Central' s serving area. <br /> 2) That Central accelerate the scheduled installation of its new <br /> digital local office in Hillsborough for the purpose of <br /> supporting these direct connections as soon as possible. <br /> 3) That both Central and General construct any new interLATA <br /> channels to a different AT&T Point of Presence. to gain <br /> higher availability and reliability through a minimum of two <br /> physically separated paths. <br /> Point 2 of the Commission's August 11, 1986 order calls for reports of <br /> toll service outages and for tests and reports on intraLATA and <br /> interLATA call completions for a period of six months. <br /> II . Therefore, we respectfully request: _ <br /> 1) That this docket remain open to review the results of the reports <br /> and of the test calls. <br /> 2) That the Commission modify its order to call for staggering <br /> times for calling into Hillsborough test numbers, and for direct <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.