Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
adopt the proposal resolving the differences between earlier <br /> recommendations. <br /> Council Member Smith asked that Orange County take into <br /> consideration the extension of services to the Homestead Road <br /> area prior to allowing massive development in the area. <br /> Council Member Pasquini asked why the County was recommending <br /> to keep part of the area north of Eubanks Road as Industrial. <br /> Mr. Collins responded that the area had been zoned industrial <br /> prior to the joint planning agreement and that the industrial <br /> development in the area had established a land use in the area. <br /> Council Member Pasquini also questioned why the County was <br /> recommending urban residential for the area north of Duke Power <br /> offices. Mr. Collins said this was in an attempt to keep the <br /> types of designations consistent with uses in the area. <br /> Council Members Preston and Andresen asked if the zoning map <br /> could be changed to a lower density for that area even if the <br /> land use plan had it designated as urban residential. Mr. <br /> Collins said the Town could propose zoning designations for the <br /> area in a manner consistent with the land use plan and that the <br /> County would in all probability adopt the zoning designation <br /> recommended by the Town. <br /> Council Member Andresen urged coordination of the zoning map <br /> with the adopted Land Use Plan. <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER GODSCHALK MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER <br /> HOWES TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 86-10-13/R-1. <br /> Council Member Pasquini said he could not vote for the <br /> resolution as proposed because of the urban residential <br /> designation for the area north of Duke Power offices. He said <br /> he felt the area should be designated suburban residential. <br /> COUNCIL MEMBER PASQUINI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER <br /> ANDRESEN TO AMEND THE MOTION TO DESIGNATE THE AREA NORTH OF <br /> DUKE POWER OFFICES IN THE PROPOSED AREA 4 (HOMESTEAD ROAD/NC <br /> 86) AS SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL INSTEAD OF URBAN RESIDENTIAL. THE <br /> MOTION CARRIED, (6-3) , WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS GODSCHALK, HOWES, <br /> AND THORPE VOTING AGAINST. <br /> THE MOTION, AS AMENDED, PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, (9-0) . <br /> COMMISSIONER MARSHALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LLOYD TO <br /> ADOPT RESOLUTION 86-10-13/R-1 AS AMENDED AND ADOPTED BY THE <br /> CHAPEL HILL TOWN COUNCIL. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, (4- <br /> 0) . <br /> The resolution, as adopted, reads as follows: <br /> RESOLUTION ADOPTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR UN-DESIGNATED <br /> AREAS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY-CHAPEL HILL JOINT PLANNING AREA LAND <br /> USE PLAN (86-10-13/R-1) . <br /> WHEREAS on July 14, 1986, the Chapel Hill Town Council adopted <br /> a recommendation endorsing a Land Use Plan for the Joint <br /> Planning Area; and <br />