Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 09-16-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 11:46:27 AM
Creation date
9/26/2016 1:46:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS Of THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT* <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION. Z -7-86 (Rezoning Request ) Allen and Doris Turner <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMI TTEO p THE PLANNING. STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE. FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 24 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING- <br /> ARTi CLE 20 SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates compl 1 ante; "No" indicates Noncompl 'r ante <br /> f PLANNING STAFF PLANNING. <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMI TTEU APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance' Requl rements FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements specs- <br /> f i ed i n .'Article .20 - Amend- <br /> "ments. 'Those requirements <br /> Inc] ude; <br /> 20.32 a) .Map showing affected Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of - Yes No s <br /> property at scale-of not less 1"=100' <br /> than 1 '= .10011 .nor more than <br /> i <br /> 20' <br /> 20.3.2 -b) Legal description of Y es �,-,-No Description provided with application .-.Yes No i <br /> property <br /> 24.3. c) Explanation of alleged "x_,Yes N o No error alleged �es No ! <br /> e-rro-r., If any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20-3.2 d) Changed conditions, If x Yes No Applicant cites GC-4 zoning on both sides--Yes "'--No <br /> f <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- and across US 74 and I-85 as justification i <br /> bly necessary to promote public for zoning,change. .The tract :immddiately -to the <br /> health, safety and general we 1 fa re: east. was- rezoned from 94�1 to GC-4 on 7-7-86. <br /> x Property is located in a 20 Year Yes No <br /> 20. 3.2 e) Manner In which proposed Yes No Transition Area and Commercial/ <br /> amendment will carry out purpose industrial bode <br /> and intent of adoptbd Comprehensive -- <br /> pian. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.