Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 09-16-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 11:46:27 AM
Creation date
9/26/2016 1:46:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The majority of mobile homes (88%) have been of single-wide construction, <br /> while the average cost of all units has increased from $9,408 in 1980 to <br /> $15.315 in 1986. <br /> Health/Safety Issues <br /> The affordability of mobile homes is one reason for their prolifera- <br /> ation in Orange County. While numbers have increased, though, concern over <br /> health and safety issues have risen as well. <br /> The Orange County Emergency .Services office was asked to comment on <br /> standards which should be considered in the development of any ordinances <br /> governing mobile homes. A similar request was made of the Orange. County <br /> Firefighters Associated and the Fire Chiefs Counsel. <br /> All groups addressed similar concerns: (1) Park/unit identification; <br /> (2) unit spacing; (3) accessway dimensions and obstructions; and (4) <br /> service/construction standards. Recommended standards are attached to this <br /> report for consideration by advisory groups and the governing board in <br /> ordinance drafting. <br /> Design Standards <br /> A final consideration was the design standards of other jurisdic- <br /> tions. The basic question is to be answered is - Are the present standards <br /> comparable or too restrictive? The attached comparison sheet indicates two <br /> features. First, differences do occur from one jurisdiction to another, <br /> but there are a number of similar standards, including tract size. <br /> pad/stand. patio, driveway. buffer. street lighting and walkway require- <br /> ments. <br /> Second. some significant differences do exist in mobile home and <br /> recreation space standards. Even though the present County standards are <br /> higher than surrounding jurisdictions, there are precedents statewide for <br /> the requirements. As an example, Mecklenburg County has the same recrea- <br /> tion space standard - 8% of the site area. Lee County requires a 10,000 <br /> sq. ft. minimum lot size even with a public or community water/sewer <br /> system. Lots may be reduced to 7.500 sq. ft. in area if a minimum of 10% <br /> of the site is donated to recreation use. Other counties such as Edgecombe <br /> and Cumberland either limit mobile home parks to higher density districts <br /> (6.000 sq. ft./unit) or limit density by the underlying zoning require- <br /> ments.i.e. , 40.000 sq. ft. in an Agricultural-Residential district. Wilson <br /> County permits spaces less than 10.000 sq. ft. in area but couples lower <br /> standards with a recreation space requirement of 400 sq. ft. for each unit. <br /> This results in a five percent recreation space standard. <br /> The basic issue which has arisen in terms of design standards is the <br /> mobile home space requirement of 10,000 sq. ft. per unit. This is . <br /> equivalent to an average density of four (4) units per acre. From the 1984 <br /> survey. 102 mobile home parks were found to be in Orange County's jurisdic- <br /> tion. The parks contained 1,883 units and had an overall net density of <br /> 1.16 units per acre. Of the 102 parks. 24 (24%) exceeded the density <br /> standard of four units per acre. These parks, however, contained 745 or <br /> 40% of all mobile homes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.