Agenda - 09-02-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

018 RECOMMENDATION : Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations and standards, the application must be approved unless it is found, in some specific manner that: 1 . The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; 3 . The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan , or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those opposing the application . The proof must also be in the form of competent material and substantial evidence. The Planning Board reviewed the application, the site plan and all supporting documentation and found that no information was received which would establish grounds for making one or more of the above findings. However, the Planning Board has not found compliance with the following specific standards applicable to planned development-housing applications: 8.2.4a) Health Department approval for all lots; 7 . 14.3a)3 sight visibility triangles at public road intersections; and 7 . 14.3a) 5 provisions for screening of parking areas . The Planning Board does recommend approval of the planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit with the attached conditions of approval . These conditions of approval address the specific standards referen ced above and design concerns .