Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-25-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 08-25-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 10:04:48 AM
Creation date
9/26/2016 11:52:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/1986
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT' <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: 2 -7-86 (Rezoning Request) Allen and Doris Turner <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING. STAFF ' <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO. SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS : <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates NoncompI I ance <br /> PLANNING STAFF PLANNING <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMITTED APPLI CATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance' Requi cements FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements specs- ' <br /> fled in .'ArtIcle .20 - Amend- <br /> ments. 'Those requirements � <br /> I ncl ude: ' <br /> 20.32 a) Map showing affected Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No } <br /> • property at scale-of not less 111-100' <br /> than 1 '- .10011 .nor more than 1 '- <br /> 20' . <br /> 28,3.2 •b) Legal description of X Yes NO Description provided with application Yes _ No } <br /> property <br /> 20-3.2. c) Explanation of alleged _ Yes N No No error alleged Yes N No <br /> error, If any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, If x Yes No APPlicant cites GC-4 zoning on both sides Yes .-No <br /> pny, which make amendment reasona- <br /> .I <br /> bly necessary to promote public across ❑ 0 and 1-85 as justification <br /> for zoning,change. .The tra.et immddiately to the <br /> heal th, safety and general wet fare: east: wasxezoned firom RBI to GC-4 on 7-7-86% <br /> X Property is located In a 20 Year Yes No <br /> 20.3.2 e) Manner In wh1cK proposed Yes No <br /> ---- -•-- <br /> amendment will carry out purpose Transition Area and Commercial/ + <br /> and Intent of edopted Comprehenslve industrial Node <br /> Plan. <br /> .oftft. f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.