Agenda - 08-19-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• • O9 4) Resource Protection Areas - Gene Bell gave a quick listing of the sections of the plan addressing resource protection areas. In particular, he referred to pages 8, 35, 49, 51 , 64, 89, 103, and 104. Dr. Gordon stated that she felt the TAC should reaffirm its position of January 2, 1986 and made the following motion which was seconded by Dr. Bennett: The Chapel Hill Township Advisory Council reaffirms its January 2, 1986 motion pertaining to recreation areas, parks, and greenways; "Recommend that the County Planning Staff prepare for consideration a proposed description of lands which can be considered candidates for acquisition to form a system of recreation areas, parks, and greenways." The vote was unanimous. 5) Joint Planning Land Use Plan as a Whole - Kirk Pelland stated that there were still portions of the Joint Planning Land Use Plan he was uncomfortable with and wanted to see discussed in more detail. Dr. Gordon suggested that since time was short the TAC address those portions of the plan on which it could agree. A brief discussion of the Southern Triangle and University Lake portions of the plan followed with general agreement of the TAC members as to the provisions for those areas. Dr. Gordon made the following motion which was seconded by Dr. Bennett: The Chapel Hill Township Advisory Council recommends approval of the Southern Triangle and University Lake Watershed sections of the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan as presented at the January 14, 1986 and April 17, 1986 Public Hearings and as shown on page 71 of the Joint Planning Land Use Plan of April 1986. In reference to the University Lake Watershed, the TAC explicitly endorses the sewer policy shown under "University Lake Watershed" on page 49. The vote was unanimous. Dr. Gordon stated that the chronology of Joint Planning decisions related to the Town of Carrboro had been most helpful and asked Gene Bell if he could procure similar documents from the Town of Chapel Hill . Bell said he thought he could and would pursue the matter. It was noted at this point that the allotted meeting time had passed and it was necessary to adjourn. Setting a date for the next meeting was put off pending action on Joint Planning by the Planning Board on May 19 and the County Commissioners on June 2. The meeting adjourned at 10:05.