Orange County NC Website
072 1 <br /> DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-5-86 DR AFT PAGE 15 <br /> County Commissioners the Planning Board needed to address <br /> density in the Rural Buffer . Chapel Hill had proposed 1 <br /> unit per 2 acres and the staff recommended 1 unit per <br /> acre. <br /> Bell mentioned Chapel Hill annexation of property east of <br /> NC 86 and south of 1 -40 along Weaver Dairy Road . Collins <br /> referenced the effective dates and the fact that the area <br /> would soon be exclusively under Chapel Hill 's planning <br /> and zoning jurisdiction . <br /> At this point, Shanklin called the question on the <br /> friendly amendment offered by Hubbard . <br /> Jacobs stated that the friendly amendment was retired and <br /> the motion was to approve the current draft of the Plan <br /> with staff recommendations . <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor . <br /> 1 opposed (Yuhasz) . <br /> Kramer then made the motion that density in the Rural <br /> Buffer be restricted to 1 dwelling per 2 acres . Pilkey <br /> seconded . <br /> Kizer said he thought it was too restrictive. Best said <br /> he had no problem with being more restrictive but he felt <br /> such a designation would promote "jump-over" into areas <br /> where the density was 1 unit per acre. He felt the <br /> densities would have to be the same in and adjacent to <br /> the buffer . <br /> VOTE: 4 in favor (Kreamer, Best, Jacobs, Hubbard) . <br /> 6 opposed (Yuhasz, Lewis, Shanklin, Kizer, Pilkey, <br /> Taylor) . <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved 1 unit per acre as the Rural Buffer <br /> density . Seconded by Kizer. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor (Yuhasz, Lewis, Shanklin, Kizer, Pilkey, <br /> Taylor) . <br /> 4 opposed (Kramer, Best, Jacobs, Hubbard) . <br /> MOTION: Best moved to adjourn . Seconded by Shanklin . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> Adjournment at 11 : 11 p .m. <br />