Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
065 DRAFT <br /> DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-5-86 PAGE 8 <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to accept part ( 1 ) Endorse principles of <br /> cooperation . . . Seconded by Pilkey. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Shanklin) . <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to accept part (2) Endorse concept of rural <br /> buffer and support minimal acreage/unit and clustering. <br /> Seconded by Best. <br /> Kizer expressed the concern again that development was <br /> being forced outside the rural buffer. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor (Pilkey, Hubbard, Jacobs, Kramer, Best, <br /> Taylor) . <br /> 4 opposed (Yuhasz, Lewis, Shanklin, Kizer) . <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to accept /3 Inappropriate for Carrboro to <br /> pursue unilateral . . . Seconded by Best. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor (Pilkey, Hubbard, Jacobs, Kramer, Best, <br /> Taylor) <br /> 4 opposed (Yuhasz, Lewis, Shanklin, Kizer) . <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to accept 04 Support Duke University public <br /> commitment. . . Seconded by Best. <br /> Kizer noted he would like to see a formal commitment from <br /> Duke University although he did not think such would be <br /> forthcoming . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Jacobs moved to accept /5 (Endorse policy of neighborhood <br /> cooperation and conservative approval . . . ) Seconded by <br /> Best. <br /> VOTE: 7 in favor (Jacobs, Best, Pilkey, Hubbard, Taylor, <br /> Shanklin) . <br /> 3 against (Lewis, Kizer, Yuhasz) . <br /> At this point Hubbard introduced a package of materials <br /> from Maryland regarding acquisition of land and compensa- <br /> tion of landowners . He said he would like for the <br /> Planning Board to consider it at a later date and <br /> hopefully see enabling legislation to be endorsed by the <br /> Planning Board and the Board of County Commissioners. <br /> Collins indicated all the maps were set up . Map /1 was <br /> presented at the January public hearing. Collins gave an <br /> overview of features - Rural Buffer, existing and <br />