Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 08-19-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 11:29:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Co 053 <br /> JPA DRAFT MINUTES 4-17-86 PAGE 14 <br /> yet the proposed plan designates the area where I live as <br /> suburban residential which would permit two to five <br /> residences per acre; that's absolutely impossible, the <br /> restrictive covenants preclude that. I know personally of. <br /> five other tracts of land in the Calvander area which have <br /> similar restrictive covenants. Therefore, the land does <br /> not adequately reflect the covenants of the neighborhood. <br /> This will be entirely misleading for anyone moving into <br /> the area or plans to develop. They would think they could <br /> put more on the property than they actually can. I <br /> propose that before any future land use plan is adopted, <br /> the deeds of all the property to be affected by the land . <br /> use category changes be examined to determine if any land <br /> use restrictions are contained in the body of the deeds <br /> and that those restrictions in land use be reflected in <br /> the land use category designations on any future land use <br /> map. " <br /> Curtis McLaughlin, Calvander resident, made the following <br /> statement: <br /> "I live in Calvander in the Homestead Hills Subdivision. <br /> and I have a number of very specific requests. Most of <br /> them help to throw some questions on the accuracy of the <br /> map and the quality of the plan. I'm addressing the County <br /> Commissioners; I don't believe in addressing anyone else I. <br /> can't vote for. So, to the County Commissioners: first <br /> of all, I would like the word North Carrboro removed from <br /> the map; secondly, the plan itself contains a very <br /> interesting element-it now has the one industrial area <br /> that remains at the greatest possible distance from 1-40. <br /> It calls for a very expensive road to bring all of those <br /> people from 1-40 into Carrboro. If you are not in a good <br /> location the only way you'll get a plan in N.C. is to give <br /> major tax concession. You've got to buy your plan. You <br /> have to get down on your knees in competition with other <br /> towns when you are that far from an interstate and give <br /> away the sewer to get the plan so why do you want it in <br /> the first place when you've got a lousy location. You <br /> don't have much labor. Why do you want to spend money to <br /> help unemployed textile workers from Mebane and further <br /> west. Then there is a residential area of high density <br /> which is at a position where it will take the most in the <br /> way of sewers and the most in the way of water and the <br /> most in the way of road construction. My property which <br /> is on Homestead Road at the corner of Drew Lane is <br /> classified on this map as urban residential. That whole <br /> subdivision is classified as one-acre zoning. With the <br /> covenants on the land, it can never be developed that way. <br /> If you look at that area from Lake Hogan Farm Road almost <br /> to the Calvander intersection, all of that property is <br /> already developed along the road so the only way you can <br /> get more density in that area is by breaking up the <br /> existing home pattern. Therefore, I would request that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.