Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 08-19-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 11:29:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 049 <br /> JPA DRAFT MINUTES 4-17-86 PAGE 10 <br /> use, Carrboro has planned for us a hundred acre industrial <br /> park, a possible 100, 000 square foot shopping center and <br /> high density urban housing to raise this nodes population <br /> by 12,000 in the next twenty years. Roy Williford, <br /> Carrboro Council members and Planning Board members <br /> confirmed that this is an annexation strategy and why. <br /> Mr. Davenport's answer sheet states clearly that this is <br /> to 'anchor' Carrboro's tax base plus the notion of <br /> developing blue collar jobs. We've never had much of a <br /> blue collar climate here and I doubt we need one since a) <br /> we have the lowest unemployment rate by county in North <br /> Carolina and b) as the planners own answer sheet states <br /> 'the jobs in the Research Triangle Park area and Chapel <br /> Hill are creating the growth. So the job argument is weak <br /> meaning that pretty much for the purpose of Carrboro's <br /> fiscal enhancement, Calvander must undergo a devastating <br /> transformation. ' North Carrboro, yes the time has come for <br /> us to raise our voices. I like Mr. Davenport's assertion. <br /> that the planners advised the elected officials on the. <br /> effect of particular growth strategies or goals. But is <br /> there an elected official here, County or Carrboro, who <br /> claims personal sponsorship for this industrial park high <br /> density annexation package. The numerous Aldermen and <br /> Planning Board members I have spoken with identify this <br /> with Carrboro's Planning Staff alone. In no way am I <br /> critizing the diligence and creativity of Carrboro's <br /> Planning Staff. These maps are carefully detailed. <br /> Perhaps an industrial park is a good idea. But lets put <br /> it in a place where it does not devastate people's homes <br /> and heritage. This area has long been known as a pat of <br /> butter in a sea of grits. Let's not rashly turn our backs <br /> on the history of the community we cherish. Let's have I <br /> 40's impact on us be beneficial not just to developers and <br /> urban tax bases but to the great majority of those of us <br /> in southern Orange County who like where we live for what <br /> it is today not just for what we can get out of it <br /> tomorrow." <br /> Nat Smith, resident on Pine Street in Carrboro began his <br /> statement noting that he felt the residents of Carrboro do <br /> have a stake in what is being proposed for the Calvander <br /> area. He noted that he enjoyed bicycling in the Calvander <br /> area and that many other residents of Carrboro derive much <br /> pleasure out of Calvander remaining as it is. He <br /> continued noting there was retail space available at <br /> Willow Creek and Plantation Plaza and he could not see the <br /> need to create more office and retail space. <br /> Jerry Koontz, resident of Barrington Hills, Carrboro, <br /> noting he is speaking in opposition to the rezoning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.