Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 08-19-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 11:29:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 048 <br /> JPA DRAFT MINUTES 4-17-86 • PAGE 9 <br /> and one-half miles, you come out still in the watershed <br /> just north of the suicide intersection of Old NC 86 and <br /> Old Fayetteville Road. Then you go down and across Bolin <br /> Creek to re-emerge on Homestead Road and put 6000 trips a <br /> day in front of the High School and Jr. High School. I <br /> would really like to hear from the School Board on this. <br /> They have plans to move Horace Williams Airport but we <br /> know that far more dangerous to the lives of young people, <br /> 6000 trips a day in front of the high school. There is an <br /> alternative. It is the Eubanks Road alternative. As it <br /> comes down it can come right straight down Old 86. You <br /> can prioritize Old Fayetteville Road. As Mr. Hartley <br /> suggested you can cross NC 54 above Plantation Acres. <br /> That's going to have to be controlled at some point at any <br /> rate. You can go from there on down Old Fayetteville Road <br /> and across Jones Ferry Road hooking up with the southern <br /> link. My question is "What does the School . Board say <br /> about the traffic problem at their end and what does NCDOT <br /> say about the environmental impact on the watershed end. <br /> I would like to hear some answers from the appropriate <br /> domain and I shall close by saying we don't want to vote <br /> in the Carrboro elections. <br /> Dave Rutter-Calvander resident made the following <br /> statement. <br /> Mr. Rutter began his presentation noting that he had been <br /> unintentionally misquoted by Jerry Davenport of the <br /> Carrboro Planning Department in a statement he had made at <br /> an April 3 Special Public Forum with Carrboro Planning <br /> Board. He continued that he must clarify that <br /> misunderstanding before his statement tonight. <br /> "I am only a citizen and a taxpayer living in the most <br /> heavily impacted area of this Land Use Plan and I am <br /> powerless in this situation except in speaking out in <br /> meetings of this type. The most unfortunate distortion of <br /> my remarks is the paragraph I read verbatim and say again <br /> tonight, "Ladies and Gentlemen the annexation statutes of <br /> North Carolina takes much of the annexation say so away <br /> from the people by proscribing the referendum. The law <br /> puts the burden of trust on the planners of communities to <br /> achieve growth reasonably, rationally and when necessary. <br /> Annexation solely for the sake of Carrboro's fiscal <br /> enhancement is a betrayal of that trust. i must say I <br /> feel the annexation law is a good law because in theory it <br /> puts cur community's growth in a status more reflective of <br /> real urbanization. Calvander is a rural area now and the <br /> 100 or so signers of the petition that we have circulated <br /> just since Monday night would like to have it remain so. <br /> I-40 or no, if growth comes we want its pace to reflect <br /> the character of the neighborhood but nobody asked us <br /> about that. Instead, though there are 2400 undeveloped <br /> acres within the County zoned or designated for industrial <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.