Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-19-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 08-19-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 12:13:13 PM
Creation date
9/26/2016 11:29:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 047 <br /> JPA DRAFT MINUTES 4-17-86 • PAGE 8 <br /> of a high-residential area. Also, the industrial park <br /> proposed should be placed nearer I-40. He continued that <br /> high residential development would need considerable <br /> infrastructure and did not belong in this area. He stated <br /> it was hard for him to understand the rationale behind <br /> these types of densities noting that they did not seem to <br /> serve human needs of a plan of this size and he wondered <br /> if this would perhaps work into a formula for annexation <br /> to get unit counts high enough to be annexed. He felt <br /> this should be designed for the wants of the people and <br /> not as an economic base for a town to grow. <br /> John Sowder--Calvander resident made the following <br /> statement. <br /> Mr. Sowder noted that Calvander residents are not opposed <br /> • <br /> to growth and do like good roads; but from Calvander's <br /> standpoint, the plan is devised to do one thing only and <br /> that is to "put tax dollars into the coffers of a <br /> financially strapped community that lies to our <br /> southeast." <br /> Mr. Sowder continued "We can't export our main product, <br /> it's not obsolete, it's the rural residential way of life. <br /> If you will focus with me for a moment, on one salient <br /> feature of this plan, if you have doubts as to what the <br /> emphasis is for the plan, I think you will understand and <br /> that feature is the Homestead Road Thoroughfare ( a <br /> misnomer if there has ever been one) . It is going to be <br /> named after the homesteads that it thoroughly plows under. <br /> It meanders. It is not primarily designed to feed traffic <br /> but to break open the backwoods to development, the sort <br /> of development that up until now by natural forces we have <br /> largely been able to avoid. The fact that Carrboro now <br /> wishes to extend water and sewer into watershed areas is a <br /> matter of record, is it not, April 10. That is an <br /> interesting way to go about protecting this watershed that <br /> Carrboro and Chapel Hill spent an incredible amount of <br /> their political coin to enhance in the western regions of <br /> the County. No matter what you do in the western regions <br /> of the County, if you pollute this watershed by running a <br /> road diagonal across it two and one-half miles, if you run <br /> sewer and water into that area, what's the purpose? it <br /> meanders. The road goes as it will to break up the new <br /> property. There are alternatives to the present routing of <br /> the thoroughfare that are much more feasible in the <br /> movement of traffic and also cost effective in terms of <br /> the acquisition and the regrettable but foreseeable use of <br /> the power to condemn the property. That corridor is the <br /> Eubanks Road corridor. What more could be done to trash <br /> that corridor than has been done for the use of the <br /> landfill. If you begin at Hatch Road where the present <br /> thoroughfare is proposed to begin you are already on the <br /> Morgan Creek Watershed. You go diagonally across it two <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.