Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF 7--21 -86 <br /> 1 9 C The • applicant, Charles Harris, purchaser, is <br /> requesting a subdivision of Lot 16 Tax Map 2, Chapel <br /> i Hill Township into a 7 acre and 10+ acre lot . <br /> • <br /> Board of Commissioners ' approval of Class A private <br /> road Is required before a minor subdivision served <br /> by this road can be approved for the Stones ' lot. <br /> Currently 9 lots are - served by the private road <br /> known as Scarlette Mountain Road . <br /> if a Class A road is approved by the Board of <br /> Commissioners . <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of a Class A <br /> road . . I f constructed to NCDOT the road would not <br /> • comply with NCDOT criteria ( length and housing unit <br /> density) for acceptance as a public road . <br /> MOTION: Margison moved approval of the Class A private road . <br /> Kramer seconded the motion . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> ZONiNG ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS <br /> The purpose of this item Is to consider a proposed <br /> text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance for approval . <br /> This proposed amendment was submitted to public <br /> hearing on May 27, 1986 . <br /> To receive the Planning Board ' s recommendation . <br /> Concerns have be,,:n identified by -;he Planningg Staff <br /> concerning moH l e home skirting/screening <br /> requiremenis -;.:; Individual <br /> r.:chi ! e homes individual lot -_ The attach ,d <br /> ,-Jrt nc1inent adc;:-r:.-: :s this concern . An issue s-i -;v <br /> vent precedes the amendment . <br /> The proposed ordinance amendment, if approved, would <br /> clarify and improve the administration of the Zoning <br /> Ordinance. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> amendment. <br /> Smith commented that the primary purpose of this <br /> amendment is aesthetic . <br /> MOTION: Margison moved approval of the amendment providing <br /> an option of appropriate landscaping in lieu of <br /> skirting . Kramer seconded the motion . <br /> • Smith clarified that the item as submitted to public <br /> hearing was not advertised in a manner which would <br />