Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-07-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 07-07-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 3:34:30 PM
Creation date
9/22/2016 2:07:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/7/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: JAMES AND MYRA KIRK"BAIT Rl Z0NIDJG <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING, BOARD O <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING F1 NDI NGS: 00 <br /> r: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTI CLE 20 - SPECI FI C STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates comp lance;"N.o" indicates Non comp] Lance <br /> PLANNING BOARD <br /> RECOMMENDED FINDINGS— SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS BOCC <br /> Ordinance Requi rements - -- -- - F NDI NGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements specl- <br /> Pied in .Article 20 - Amend- <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> include: <br /> 20.32 a) Map showing affected Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No- <br /> property at scale of not less 1"=100' <br /> than P== 1001' nor more than 1 '_ <br /> 20' <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description of X Yes No Description provided with application Yes No <br /> property <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged Yes No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, i f any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment . <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions , if X Yes No Applicant cites adjacent rion- Yes No <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- �. :es det tial�and -used and-traffic <br /> bly necessary to promote public impacts resulting in the unsuitability <br /> heal th, safety and general welfare: of the property for residential use . • <br /> 20. 3.2 a Manner in which X Property is located In a- 20. Year <br /> } proposed Yes �o Transition Area and Commercial/ Yes No <br /> amendment will carry out purpose Industrial Node <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive <br /> Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.