Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-07-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 07-07-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 3:34:30 PM
Creation date
9/22/2016 2:07:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/7/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wuld apply. 13‘! <br /> Arnie Katz indicated that he resented the enforcement of aesthetic stan- <br /> dards on mobile homes. <br /> Roger Dale Stephens questioned the timing for inspection of mobile homes <br /> for compliance with the screening standard, noting that the mobile home <br /> needs to settle when placed on a site. Screening would have to be instal- <br /> led when the home settles. Commissioner Lloyd inquired who long it takes a <br /> mobile home to settle. Stephens responded that it takes sixty to ninety <br /> days. Underpinning before' the home settles is useless and may result in <br /> damaged underpinning. <br /> Collins noted that a temporary certificate (ninety day option) could be <br /> issued. If the screening were not inst.:tiled, the power could be turned <br /> off . Stephens responded that that w uld solve the project but would <br /> increase the burden on the inspectors. <br /> AGENDA ITEM 5g ARTICLE 22 DEFINITIONS (SKIRTING) <br /> The staff presentation was ' made by Smith . <br /> There was no discussion on this item. <br /> AGENDA ITEM 5h ARTICLE 8 SECTION 8. 4 .2 and 8.4.6 (SPECIAL USE PERMIT <br /> APPLICATION REVIEW PERIODS) <br /> The staff presentation was made by Smith . <br /> Commissioner Marshall inquired why additional time was needed, noting that <br /> this added to the overall project tiniu, <br /> Smith responded that the additional -F ? ' was needed to assure adequate time <br /> for review of projects by the Board and staff . She noted that both the <br /> Board and staff process projects in timely manner, but on occasion <br /> additional review time is required needs to be provided for in the <br /> ordinance. <br /> AGENDA ITEM 51 ARTICLE 8 SECTION 8.4 ( RE--APPLICATION MEETING FOR SPECIAL <br /> USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS) - <br /> The staff presentation was made by Sm " - I, , <br /> Planning Board member Jacobs indicatc,c that the need for this step was <br /> brought to light in the review and app-oval process for Scotswood . <br /> AGENDA ITEM 5j ARTICLE 7 and 8 (CONSOLIDATION OF PROVISIONS) <br /> Jacobs distributed the letter received from Alice Gordon and dated May 27, <br /> 1986 . He requested that the item be removed from the agenda for further <br /> review. <br /> The meeting adjourned at 11 : 30 p .m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.