Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-17-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 06-17-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 12:04:43 PM
Creation date
9/22/2016 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/17/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AS PROPOSED BY C.A.S.H. (Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris) <br /> RESOLUTION FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TO SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT <br /> Whereas the citizens of North Carolina have resoundingly voiced our <br /> opposition, through a recent state-wide referendum, to the location of a high- <br /> level nuclear waste site within the borders of our beloved state, and <br /> Whereas high-level nuclear waste is stored in cooling ponds on-site at <br /> nuclear power plants for a number of years until the waste has "cooled down" <br /> sufficiently to be transported to permanent waste sites, and <br /> Whereas high-level nuclear waste from power plants is then transported <br /> along the roads, highways and railways of North Carolina and other states to <br /> permanent waste sites, through cities, townSand rural areas such as Orange <br /> County that may not even use the electricity generated by particular nuclear <br /> power plants, and <br /> Whereas the cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant has been es- <br /> timated by Carolina Power and Light to be as low as $100 million, but by other <br /> experts to be as high as $200 million to $3 billion and even $17 billion <br /> (allowing for inflation over a thirty- or forty-year period), and these costs <br /> will be passed on to consumers and taxpayers, and <br /> Whereas the casts of construcing a high-level nuclear waste dump run <br /> about $10 billion, and taxpayers, whether they use nuclear-power electricity <br /> or not, will be required to share in this expense, and <br /> Whereas communities throughout the United States are making clear their <br /> opposition to the locations of high-level nuclear waste sites, thereby increas- <br /> ing the likelihood that old nuclear power plants will be left as they are and <br /> not be properly dismantled and decommissioned, and <br /> Whereas the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plants poses a potential <br /> threat to the public health and safety of the citizens of Orange County both as <br /> an operational plant that could have a serious accident and later as an old <br /> plant that is not properly decommissioned and disassembled, and <br /> Whereas there are safe alternatives to nuclear fuel, and the cost of con- <br /> verting Shearon Harris to non-nuclear fuel is less than the total costs of <br /> completing Shearon Harris as a nuclear power plant, proper handling and tem- <br /> porary storage of spent fuel rods on-site, Shearon Harris's share of the con- <br /> struction and maintenance of one or more high-level nuclear waste dumps, proper <br /> transportation, storage and monitoring of Shearon Harris's nuclear waste, and <br /> the ultimate cost of properly decommissioning Shearon Harris, <br /> Now therefore be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange <br /> County, on behalf of the citizens of Orange County, their health and safety, <br /> take whatever steps are necessary to secure the conversion of Shearon Harris <br /> to the non-nuclear generation of electricity. <br /> Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County <br /> make known their opposition to the licensing and operation of Shearon Harris <br /> as a nuclear power plant to Carolina Power and Light, the North Carolina <br /> Utilities Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.