Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
22e, <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 12 <br /> from the audience noted that the Chapel Hill/Carrboro <br /> Schools are 120% over capacity. <br /> MOTION: Pilkey moved that a meeting be requested with the School <br /> Superintendents, Board of County Commissioners and <br /> appointed members of the Planning Board to discuss the <br /> problems of the projects and their impacts on the schools. <br /> Smith noted the Towns should also be involved in this <br /> meeting (Chapel Hill , Carrboro and Hillsborough) . <br /> Motion was seconded by Kramer. <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor (Kramer, Best, Hubbard, Jacobs, Pilkey) . <br /> 5 opposed (Yuhasz, Shanklin, Kizer, Walters, Lewis) . <br /> Motion failed . <br /> Best inquired the reasons for the "no" votes . <br /> Yuhasz noted that he did not feel the entire Planning Board <br /> should attend such a meeting. Jacobs responded the motion <br /> spoke to only designated members, not the full Planning <br /> Board. <br /> Shanklin commented that the Planning Board is not <br /> designated to look into school matters. Kizer agreed with <br /> Shanklin. <br /> Hubbard felt that land for schools is a land use matter. <br /> Kizer noted that if land for schools is a condition for <br /> approval of a development project, it' s a taking of land <br /> without compensation. if land is to be taken for public <br /> use, then let the County pay for it. <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved to reconsider the motion regarding a meeting <br /> of the School Superintendents, Board of County <br /> Commissioners and designated members of the Planning Board . <br /> Seconded by Pilkey. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor. <br /> 4 opposed (Kizer, Best, Walters, Shanklin) . <br /> Shanklin seconded motion made previously by Hubbard <br /> including the revision of condition #1 . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for <br /> Homestead Highlands subject to staff conditions. Seconded <br /> by Lewis. <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor. <br /> 4 opposed (Kramer, Hubbard, Best, Jacobs) . <br />