Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-17-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 06-17-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 12:04:43 PM
Creation date
9/22/2016 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/17/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION <br /> ORANGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONVENTION <br /> APRIL 5, 1986 <br /> 4. WHEREAS, the 1985 Orange County Democratic Party Platform state <br /> that: "All elected officials, and appointed officials in high policy making <br /> positions should be required to annually disclose significant property or <br /> business holdings, or disclose sources of income which may reasonably affect <br /> their judgment in office" ; and, <br /> WHEREAS, other jurisdictions, in fast growing areas of North <br /> Carolina, including Guilford County, Wake County, Raleigh, Charlotte, and <br /> Durham have ethics policies or are considering their adoptions; and, <br /> WHEREAS, a stiff conflict of interest code in Guilford County <br /> (requested by Guilford officials and enacted by the N.C. legislature in <br /> 1974) has worked well for Guilford county Commissioners; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the potential for conflict of interest by public officials <br /> in Orange County is increasing because of rapid development in the area. <br /> BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Orange County Board of Commissioners be <br /> urged to request the N.C. State Legislature to enact a code of ethics for <br /> members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners. This code should <br /> provide for complete disclosure of real property holdings in Orange County <br /> and ownership interests in firms doing business with Orange County. Board <br /> members should be required to disqualify themselves for voting on any matter <br /> involving any ownership interest. <br /> VOTE: AYES, 4 ; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Lloyd) . <br /> 6. GOVERNOR'S HIGHWAY PROGRAM PROPOSAL <br /> Motion was made by Chair Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Marshall to oppose the transfer of funds from the State General <br /> Fund to the Highway Fund until such time the State is able to <br /> meet its obligations to local government and its' mandates it <br /> has already provided and meet its commitments to education. <br /> VOTE: AYES, 3 ; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) <br /> 7. ALERT CABLE REOUEST FOR EXPANSION OF FRANCHISE SERVICE AREA <br /> Joe Surles spoke in support of his request for an amendment to the <br /> Cable TV Franchise in which the restriction which permits it to serve only <br /> those homes which were connected to Alert's system would be amended to <br /> remove this restriction so that it may provide service generally to the <br /> citizens of Orange County. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Carey to reestablish the Cable Television Citizen Advisory Committee to <br /> review the Alert Cable TV service area expansion request and to draft <br /> specific standards by which an amendment may be considered by the Board. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 8. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Marshall to approve the Transportation Development Plan as presented by the <br /> County Manager. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. (Chair Willhoit was out of the room) <br /> 9. HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS PRELIMINARY PLAN <br /> Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the <br /> Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands. Piedmont Atlantic Inc. has <br /> requested approval of a subdivision for 47. 19 acres of land located off <br /> Homestead Road (SR 1177) to permit construction of a seventy-eight (78) lot <br /> subdivision to be developed in three phases. The Planning Board recommended <br /> approval with the attachment of ten (10) conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.