Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-17-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 06-17-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 12:04:43 PM
Creation date
9/22/2016 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/17/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORANGE COUNTY PLANING DEPARTMENT 9 <br /> N <br /> HILLSBOROUGH <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> 27278 <br /> p•tI <br /> e <br /> 6717"T <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Jane. Atwater, Planner G <br /> FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer` <br /> SUBJECT: Stormwater Management for Lynnwood Acres II <br /> DATE: May 8, 1986 <br /> This plan proposes to meet the Ordinance requirements <br /> by constructing a stormwater detention pond to hold <br /> the post-development peak rate of runoff to the <br /> predevelopment rate. Implementation of the proposed <br /> plan would control the peak rate of runoff to the <br /> pre-development rate for a ten-year storm. <br /> i question the wisdom of requiring the implementation <br /> offt a detention structure in a situation such as this <br /> subdivision. The construction of the detention pond <br /> and the necessary diversion to direct runoff to the <br /> pond creates an additional disturbance of the <br /> existing woods and reduction of the natural absorbing <br /> and filtering capacity of the property. The lots in <br /> this subdivision a very large in comparison to the <br /> expected area of impervious surface to be added, and <br /> the existing pond, which is part of this property, <br /> would will act as a filtering device and a detention <br /> device without the necessity of additional distur- <br /> bance or construction . <br /> It would seem to be to the designers advantage to <br /> consider these points and apply the existing <br /> conditions to meeting the Ordinance requirements. <br /> c: Phil Post & Associates <br /> PLUVA1 54-e6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.